[ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] AMENDMENT - Motion on Conditional Participation of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for CCWG-IG

Marilyn Cade marilynscade at hotmail.com
Wed Dec 14 20:01:55 UTC 2016


Tatiana, this CCWG has always practiced openness in welcoming comments and collaboration


M


________________________________
From: ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org <ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Dr. Tatiana Tropina <t.tropina at mpicc.de>
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 1:16 PM
To: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] AMENDMENT - Motion on Conditional Participation of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for CCWG-IG


Hi all,

I don't wear a nice hat of an officially appointed member of this CCWG-IG, but I can certainly volunteer to be a part of the volunteers group (and bring some geographic diversity at least to this group of volunteers?). I dunno whether non-members can contribute though, so will see what you say.

Cheers

Tanya

On 14/12/16 17:53, Greg Shatan wrote:
I suggest we assemble a (Re-)Drafting Team and get on with it.

Marilyn has volunteered.
It might be a fair assumption that Keith and Farzi have "volunteered" as well, by replying to this email.  (Which probably means I have volunteered too).
Whether or not that's a fair assumption, I think we need some non-GNSO participation in the drafting team to round things out (Marilyn, Keith, Farzi and I are all similarly afflicted, though with different strains of the GNSO virus).  A preponderance of GNSO folk is fine (especially since the GNSO is the "inspiration" for this project), but we should be somewhat more diverse than that....  (Farzi no longer even gives us geographic diversity, since she's now a North American Georgia Peach, or Georgia Tech Yellow Jacket, or something like that...)

Let's not wait until the meeting next week to get this going.  Wouldn't it be nice to have a progress report at next week's meeting instead?

Any other volunteers?

Anyone volunteering to chair?  (Not I, with apologies, I'm chaired-out at the moment.)

Greg

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:15 AM, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com<mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>> wrote:
Thanks Keith for bringing this up again. I think we need to start doing something about it and we have to start soon.

On 14 December 2016 at 11:10, Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com<mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com>> wrote:
Hi all,

Is there a plan to get this process started? Copenhagen will be here before we know it.

Regards,
Keith




Keith Drazek
Vice President
Public Policy & Government Relations
Verisign, Inc.
+1-571-377-9182<tel:+1%20571-377-9182>
kdrazek at verisign.com<mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com>



From: ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org>] On Behalf Of Rafik Dammak
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 4:10 AM
To: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
Subject: [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] AMENDMENT - Motion on Conditional Participation of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for CCWG-IG


Hi everyone,

GNSO council just approved unanimously this motion. It is still chartering organization but we got work to do by Copenhagen meeting.

Best,

Rafik
---
>
> 2.         MOTION – Conditional participation of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN
>
> Made by: Darcy Southwell
>
> Seconded by:
>
>
>
> WHEREAS:
>
> a)      The GNSO Council adopted the charter for a Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN and make recommendations to the chartering organization on these issues on 15 October 2014, and as such became a Chartering Organization.
>
> b)      The Charter foresees that “At each ICANN Annual General Meeting, starting 2014, the Charter and deliverables of the WG shall be reviewed by the participating SO’s and AC’s to determine whether the WG should continue, or, close and be dissolved. Consistent with ICANN community practices, the WG will continue if at least two of the participating SO’s or AC’s extend the Charter of the WG and notify the other participating SO’s and AC’s accordingly one month after the annual review date”.
>
> c)      The CWG-IG provided its first written status update on 23 June 2016 (see https://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/ccwg-internet-governance-23jun16-en.pdf).
>
> d)      The GNSO Council recently adopted the “Uniform Framework of Principles and Recommendations for Cross Community Working Groups” (CWG Framework) which details the lifecycle of a CCWG including initiation, formation, operation, decision-making, adoption of Final Report by Chartering Organizations and closure of CCWG, and post-closure of CCWG.
>
> e)      The GNSO Council has observed that the CWG-IG does not follow this lifecycle, nor has it established or adopted an initial work plan and associated schedule as foreseen in its Charter.
>
> f)       The GNSO Council recognizes the importance of a continued dialogue and discussion in relation to the topic of Internet Governance within an ICANN context.
>
> g)      The GNSO Council has shared its concerns with the ccNSO Council and representatives of other SO/ACs on the subject of this CWG and its future.
>
>
>
> RESOLVED:
>
> a)      The GNSO Council will continue to participate as a Chartering Organization for the CWG-IG. However, this participation is conditioned upon a comprehensive review of the CWG-IG Charter by the CWG-IG, in accordance with the CWG Framework (http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf). In particular, the GNSO Council expects future work to be subject to a clear work plan, with regular updates and clear deliverables.
>
> b)      The GNSO Council expects that the CWG-IG will present by ICANN58 a report on its findings, which may include a revised charter or a recommendation to reconstitute the group under a new structure.
>
> c)      Following the submission of the CWG-IG report, the GNSO Council will consider the recommendations and decide whether or not it will continue as a Chartering Organization.
>
> d)      The GNSO Secretariat will communicate this decision to the CWG-IG Chairs as well as the other Chartering Organizations.
>
>

_______________________________________________
ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance




--
Farzaneh

_______________________________________________
ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance





_______________________________________________
ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20161214/30a86199/attachment.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list