[ccwg-internet-governance] ICANN58 Block Schedule and High Interest Topic

farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
Sun Dec 18 02:09:23 UTC 2016


I support Greg's idea. Open meeting, a good timeslot and ideas on how to
improve  ccwg-ig.

On 17 December 2016 at 12:34, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:

> What about having our meeting in Copenhagen be an open meeting with a good
> time slot, rather than planning a separate HIT?  CCWGs don't generally put
> on HITs anyway....
>
> I agree that getting our house in order and our lease extended is our
> primary focus.
>
> Greg
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 12:17 PM farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Actually, not doing a HIT is not hiding away . Not doing a HIT can lead
>> to directing our resources to what should be done. For example, Nigel
>> drafted a statement for CSTD on enhanced cooperation. Did we
>> collaboratively come up with a document that he could use? no. Did we even
>> discuss what we want to do with CSTD EC or whether we don't want to do
>> anything? no.  People  spent way too much time on organizing the HIT last
>> time as many others did. It was a great discussion. But what was the follow
>> up? nothing. Please don't impose your interpretation upon us, we don't want
>> to hide away but make things better for ccwg-ig and make it as it should be.
>>
>> On 17 December 2016 at 12:02, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> sorry, attacked... not attached. too many arthritis challenges to typing.
>> TOOOO old challenges.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>> *From:* ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org <
>> ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Marilyn Cade <
>> marilynscade at hotmail.com>
>>
>>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, December 17, 2016 11:56 AM
>>
>>
>> *To:* James Gannon; farzaneh badii
>>
>>
>> *Cc:* CCWG
>>
>>
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] ICANN58 Block Schedule and
>> High Interest Topic
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: 😊]
>>
>>
>> I beg to disagree, but that is no surprise.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> When attached, running away from a challenge is not the best strategy.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> We are a legitimate CCWG, after all, so let's address both challenges.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Are we saying that we are not legitimate? so we are afraid of the
>> questions being asked?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I doubt that.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I have seen this over and over. Someone challenges us. so we start
>> withdrawing and hiding away.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> In my view,  we are not ashamed or apologizing for the work we have done,
>> and can do.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Right?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>> *From:* James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net>
>>
>>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, December 17, 2016 11:49 AM
>>
>>
>> *To:* farzaneh badii; Marilyn Cade
>>
>>
>> *Cc:* CCWG
>>
>>
>> *Subject:* RE: [ccwg-internet-governance] ICANN58 Block Schedule and
>> High Interest Topic
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I agree with Farzi here from the peanut gallery, I don’t think now is the
>> time for the CCWGIG to be putting effort in the area of creating HITs
>> rather than focusing on what
>>
>> should be its primary task right now.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -James
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ccwg-internet-
>> governance-bounces at icann.org]
>>
>> *On Behalf Of *farzaneh badii
>>
>>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, December 17, 2016 3:52 PM
>>
>>
>> *To:* Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com>
>>
>>
>> *Cc:* CCWG <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
>>
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] ICANN58 Block Schedule and
>> High Interest Topic
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I really don't think it's a good idea to have a HIT for Copenhagen. It
>> takes our attention away from making ccwg ig relevant and it took a lot of
>> time and effort last time to have a good session. I think resources should
>> be directed towards
>>
>> making the ccwg ig a relevant active ongoing ccwg. Not a one session
>> show. Let's have a working session instead of a HIT. If we want to inform
>> people about igf and the like we can do it in out face to face meeting.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 17 Dec 2016 09:50, "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I know that some hate the idea of a round up, but IGF2016 and ICANN's
>> continued engagement in IG meetings - such as IGF, CSTD, ITU WSIS and IPP;
>> ECOSOC HLPF, WSIS Forum -- to me are an interesting
>>
>> discussion -- as a town hall - with the community.And, we should also
>> assume some responsibility for explaining the SDGs and why ICANN has a role
>> to play, alongside all other stakeholders.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Something like: consultation for ICANN's future engagement in the IG
>> landscape and contributing to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals,
>> within the mandate of ICANN. ICANN is a key player
>>
>> in the larger IG ecosystem, working within its mandate, but recognizing
>> that it influences, educates, and contributes to the broader IG debates and
>> policy discussions, along side other stakeholders.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I think this is important to ensure that the Board WG, and the CEO and
>> staff, hear from the broader community.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I have no idea how many members of the ICANN community itself attended
>> IGF2016.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I am trying to do a "count" for the IGF-USA and the NRIs to identify the
>> broader attendance, just for informational purposes.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> We could treat this like a true town hall again, with 4-5 roving mikes,
>> something like was done at the WSIS+10/IG and SDG and prepare an outcome
>> statement to be then circulated more broadly for
>>
>> public comment.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Marilyn Cade
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:*
>>
>> ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org <ccwg-internet-governance-
>> bounces at icann.org> on behalf
>>
>> of Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
>>
>>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, December 17, 2016 4:42 AM
>>
>>
>> *To:* internet >>
>>
>> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
>>
>>
>> *Subject:* [ccwg-internet-governance] ICANN58 Block Schedule and High
>> Interest Topic
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> the draft block schedule for ICANN 58 is out already. (see attached)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Please see the information on the HITs from the last two ICANN Meetings
>> below just received from Meetings staff.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *ICANN56 (Policy Forum)  |  Helsinki*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Headcount*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Cross-Community Session: Next Generation Registration Directory Services
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 215
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Cross-Community Session: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 208
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 3
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Cross-Community Session: Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in
>> All gTLDs
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 190
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 4
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Cross-Community Session: Country and Other Geographic Names Forum
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 182
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 5
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ICANN56 Wrap Up & Planning Ahead for ICANN57
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 149
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 6
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Cross-Community Session: Workload Scheduling and Management
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 109
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 7
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Cross-Community Session: Charter for the CCWG on Auction Proceeds
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 101
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 8
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Cross-Community Session: Draft Framework of Principles for Future CCWGs
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 65
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *ICANN57(AGM) |  Hyderabad*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Headcount*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> High Interest Topics session: Mitigation of Abuse in gTLDs
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 338
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Update on WHOIS-Related Initiatives
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 261
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 3
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> DNS and Content Regulation  NCUC Group
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 197
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 4
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Exploring the Public Interest Within ICANN's Remit
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 190
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 5
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> High Interest Topic session: Underserved Regions in ICANN
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 166
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 6
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Q&A with ICANN General Counsel on the legal advice that ICANN receives &
>> how that supports the ICANN mission
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 132
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 7
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> How to do outreach within each SO/AC
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 119
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 8
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Internet Governance Public Session
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 101
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> You'll notice that our Internet Governance Public Session was the least
>> attended session of the High Interest Topics. That said, it was late in the
>>
>> day, thus would have lost headcount.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The deadline for Hit Interest Topic Session proposals is on Friday 23rd
>> Dec 2016, so we need to file a request this week. Any suggestions?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Kindest regards,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Olivier
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
>>
>>
>> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
>>
>>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Farzaneh
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
>>
>> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
>>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>>
>>


-- 
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20161217/f3f860d4/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OutlookEmoji-?.png
Type: image/png
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20161217/f3f860d4/OutlookEmoji--0001.png>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list