[ccwg-internet-governance] Proposed Agenda for CCWG IG public meeting in Marrakech

farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
Mon Feb 1 09:38:00 UTC 2016


I agree with Bill.  But I think Bill should in fact talk about his paper
with some new faces.

Marilyn can you please provide more detail as to how igf sec and cstd fit
into the agenda? What new insights will they provide?
On 1 Feb 2016 10:18, "William Drake" <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:

> Marilyn I would really appreciate it if you would stop asserting that I
> want to talk about my paper.  I have never said that. I suggested that
> fragmentation / openness is an important topic that’s being discussed
> outside our bubble that is relevant to it and that if we wanted to do
> something new instead of recycling the usual topics ad infinitum this was
> one option. That’s it.  Please do not mischaracterize what I’ve said to
> suit your purposes.
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2016, at 19:12, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Might I again insist that we invite Chengetai Masango, IGF Secretariat and
> Peter Major, CSTD Chair to this session. That would fit into 1,2.3
>
> I realize that Bill has a strong interest to speak about his paper, but
> that has to be understood within a broader context, so that we do not take
> advantage in any way of our own endeavors.
>
> I am sure that can be accommodated, carefully and respectively.
>
> I would like to change the order to have the GAC High Level feedback much
> earlier in the agenda, as it deserves.
>
> Marilyn Cade
>
> To: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> From: ocl at gih.com
> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 17:46:14 +0000
>
> Subject: [ccwg-internet-governance] Proposed Agenda for CCWG IG public
> meeting in Marrakech
>
> Hello all,
>
> just a summary of today's call:
> (Call Agenda: https://community.icann.org/x/9Qh1Aw )
>
> * The Group gave a green light to Nigel Hickson in sending the attached
> proposal to WSIS Forum organisers, as a placeholder for future text that
> will expand more on the contents of the session.
>
> * We added an agenda item to the call, which was a discussion on the
> proposed Public Session of the CCWG IG in Marrakech. After some
> discussion, the proposed agenda is as follows:
>
> Proposed Public Session in Marrakech (75 minutes total time)
>
> 1. The WSIS+10 process (20 minutes)
> a. main outcomes
> b. what to look out for in the future
>
> 2. Debate about Fragmentation vs. Openness (30 minutes)
>
> Inputs:
> WEF - fragmentation paper
> OECD debate on this topic. Is a follow-up to ministerial meeting in Seoul.
> Context in the names and numbers
> The Wushen conference
>
> 3. GAC High Level meeting takeaway (5 minutes)
>
> --- end of proposed agenda
>
> It was recognised that not much input was received from CCWG IG
> participants on the mailing list, neither on the proposal to hold a
> workshop at WSIS Forum, nor on the proposed agendas for Marrakech. So
> please take some time to read through this and to express your comments
> in between calls.
>
> Kindest regards,
>
> Olivier
>
>
> _______________________________________________ ccwg-internet-governance
> mailing list ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20160201/17c975e5/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list