[ccwg-internet-governance] FOLLOW UP ACTIONS FROM THE CCWG IG MEETING ON 29/1

Veni Markovski veni.markovski at icann.org
Mon Feb 8 20:12:06 UTC 2016


Marilyn,

I will be next week in Geneva - from Tuesday till Friday. 
Will be happy to meet you and other folks there.

 

v/

 

From: ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marilyn
Cade
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 15:03
To: Nigel Hickson; ccwg
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] FOLLOW UP ACTIONS FROM THE CCWG IG
MEETING ON 29/1

 

Nigel,Thanks so much for the staff support to the CCWG-IG on our planning
for the WSIS Forum workshop. I offer a few edits in an attachment. 

 

On other items: thanks so much for your great summary reports: 

 the staff summary reports on meetings that ICANN is engaging in that are
related to IG areas are exactly what we as the CCWG-IG welcome, and I would
really love to see similar reports being provided from LATAM, Africa,
N.American, Asian events, as that will strengthen the knowledge and capacity
the CCWG-IG regarding what staff is doing in IG areas, and also strengthen
the transparency.  

 

Who might be in Geneva next week?

On a different note, might I ask who all I might see next week in Geneva,
during the ITU Council WG on WSIS?  This might also provide a time for some
face to face discussions, but also, we should plan for further refinement
during our face to face during the ICANN55.

 

Date and time for CCWG - IG working session during ICANN55:

I apologize, but I seem to have misplaced the information about when our f-f
working session of our CCWG-IG is.

 

M

  _____  

From: nigel.hickson at icann.org
To: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 19:34:22 +0000
Subject: [ccwg-internet-governance] FOLLOW UP ACTIONS FROM THE CCWG IG
MEETING ON 29/1

Colleagues 

 

Good afternoon; ahead of our Call tomorrow, and apologies for delay, please
see Notes of two of the Brussels "IG" sessions the week before last at which
ICANN were represented.    

 

I also attach the text of the proposal for a Workshop (on ICANN
Accountability) at the WSIS Forum 2016 which was discussed and agreed in the
WG. 

 

Best

 

Nigel 

 

  

RIPE NCC Roundtable, Brussels; 26/1

 

 

There were about 65 attendees, mainly from EU/ GCC Governments and LEAs .
It was a closed meeting, and by invitation only. 

 

The day started with a welcome and succinct presentation of RIPE NCC to the
group. There was then an introduction of the IANA Stewardship transition
work, how the RIRs participated and the fact they wanted the transition to
go forward, that they were happy with the agreement on the IP rights at
IANA, the SLA being negotiated with ICANN and the controversial items
remaining at CCWG to resolve. 

 

RIPE said their group was happy there won't be a 4th draft from the
Accountability CCWG and are eager to see the supplemental work of the  CCWG
on ICANN mission, human rights, stress test 18 and role of GAC in new
decision making mechanisms. 

 

The discussions that ensued saw RIPE board members question GAC on their
positions -to which Thomas Schneider helpfully was able to reply. He noted
there were divergent GAC views on a few issues. He said Governments would
like the CCWG to have final output to which Governments can agree (as
opposed to unfinished proposals on contentious items) or not. 

 

Afterwards there were presentations on developments in the RIPE address
policy working groups where 29 countries participate (region has over 11,500
members in 76 countries) including representatives of the British, German,
Spanish, Swiss governments. 

 

Then Germany presented a government's experiences in engaging with RIRs and
RIPE on the evolution of the RIPE NCC ecosystem

 

The last presentation of the day was on meeting the challenges of the
Internet of Things (IoT) which generated a lot of interest and discussion. 

 

 

GAC Public Safety Working Group; Brussels; 28/1 

 

The GAC's Public Safety Working Group (PSWG) focuses on aspects of ICANN's
policies and procedures that implicate the safety of the public. The PSWG
was established in February 2015 at ICANN52 in Singapore as an internal
working group of ICANN's Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC). The GAC
endorsed the PSWG's terms of reference in June 2015. 

There were around  60 people present from Governments and LEAs. 

The first presentation introduced the PSWG to the group. Then EURID
presented work they have been doing for the past 2 years on fighting abuse
in general at registrars level 


Europol presented the European perspective on Internet Governance and Law
Enforcement through a collection of real cases ,and noted their work in
helping other governments and LEAs understand different issues in
cyberspace.  


The European Commission presented work at their level on data retention
issues (a controversial issue in Europe). 

 

The work on ICANN Competition, Consumer Choice & Consumer Trust Review was
presented by the FTC 

 

The next PSWG will take place in Marrakech - tentative date of March 8, to
be confirmed.

 


_______________________________________________ ccwg-internet-governance
mailing list ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20160208/17808ba0/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5519 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20160208/17808ba0/smime-0001.p7s>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list