[ccwg-internet-governance] Follow-up to Call of 9 Feb 2016

farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
Wed Feb 10 17:59:29 UTC 2016


Wolfgang is not a board member anymore .

And why do we have to steer away the discussion about Wuzhen and ICANN?
This is not about Fadi. It is about ICANN being represented there and if it
is ok for ICANN to continue its representation.... so if it comes up , why
not discuss it ?


On 10 February 2016 at 18:38, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com> wrote:

> Dear Bill,
>
> On 10/02/2016 13:05, William Drake wrote:
> > Hi Olivier
> >
> > On this piece,
> >
> >> On Feb 10, 2016, at 01:11, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> 3. Discussion about Fragmentation vs. Openness (30 minutes)
> >>
> >> This is a discussion about Internet fragmentation in the context of
> >> ICANN.
> > Suggest the framing be fragmentation a] generally, for context of the
> discussion, and b] re: names and numbers, and ICANN’s contributions to
> mitigating/managing.
> >
> > The text below relates only to b] but the inputs you mention pertain to
> a]. So perhaps balance across.
>
> Yes - good point. So a balance of both, at least in the introduction, so
> as to give a fuller picture.
>
> >
> >> As we know, there has been concern about the single root, about
> >> universal acceptance of IDN ad other new gTLDs, about demands for
> >> Country Internet Registries, amongst a lot of other things.
> > One of the things worth flagging here might be blocking?
>
> +1 - an unfortunately growing trend. Blocking/filtering. I am now also
> hearing of ideas to compel users to only have access to a "local"
> nameserver. Thus the DNS is being turned into a machine for censorship.
>
> >
> >> This part of
> >> the session is aimed at stimulating a good discussion about these issues
> >> in the ICANN Community. Several inputs are proposed to trigger
> discussions:
> >>
> >> Inputs:
> >> WEF - fragmentation paper (presented by Bill Drake?)
> > I can overview the debate and issues addressed by the paper and by other
> sources
>
> Excellent!
>
> >
> >> OECD debate on this topic - with possible topics of discussions in the
> >> forthcoming meeting in Cancun. (Presented by who?)
> >> The process of the World Internet Conference (WIC), Wuzhen Summit
> >> (Presented by who?)
> > Wolfgang?
>
> If he has attended it. I know George Sadowski & Rinalia Abdul Rahim
> have, as members of the ICANN Board.
>
> >
> >> Other Contexts in the names and numbers (Presented by who?)
> > Avri or someone else GNSOish who can overview issues related to
> acceptance, conflicts, blocking, etc?
>
> Avri's excellent for explaining issues in an exciting way.
>
> >
> > Conversation starters should shoot for under 15 min together and then
> open to floor for 15+.  Will be cramped but maybe could still plant a few
> seeds...
>
> Oh yes -- very slim starters. Absolutely no lecturing. But let's not
> impose hardwall time limits like 1 minute or whatsoever. I've noticed
> that when time strictness is enforced too rigidly, participants end up
> focussing on the time rather than on what's being said, especially if
> people are being cut in mid-sentences or mid-arguments.
> Kindest regards,
>
> Olivier
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>



-- 
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20160210/9435a9bc/attachment.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list