[ccwg-internet-governance] Follow-up to Call of 9 Feb 2016

Nigel Hickson nigel.hickson at icann.org
Thu Feb 11 00:31:11 UTC 2016

Good evening

Just for clarification (and not opining on the agenda of the public IG session) there were two Board members (in addition to Fadi Chehade) present at Wuzhen Conference; George Sadowsky and Rinalia Abdul Rahim.  Both were there in a personal capacity.



From: <ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com<mailto:marilynscade at hotmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday 10 February 2016 17:01
To: William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com<mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com<mailto:ocl at gih.com>>
Cc: ccwg <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Follow-up to Call of 9 Feb 2016

thanks, Bill.

As to Wolfgang speaking -- was he at Wuzan Conference? As he is  also a Board member of ICANN and a co author of your paper on fragmentation, and has spoken many many time, as Farzaneh noted, maybe we look further.

But more importantly, as a Board member, he may be obliged to defend Fadi, should the issue of Fadi's separate meetings come up during the session.

Was there anyone there from the community at the Conference, as just an attendee? I saw a few folks who were attending not associated with ICANN.

I should have thought about this on our call, but doesn't the SSAC have a paper on blocking? Adding in a SSAC speaker might also be a very useful addition.


> From: wjdrake at gmail.com<mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:05:49 +0100
> To: ocl at gih.com<mailto:ocl at gih.com>
> CC: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Follow-up to Call of 9 Feb 2016
> Hi Olivier
> On this piece,
> > On Feb 10, 2016, at 01:11, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com<mailto:ocl at gih.com>> wrote:
> >
> > 3. Discussion about Fragmentation vs. Openness (30 minutes)
> >
> > This is a discussion about Internet fragmentation in the context of
> > ICANN.
> Suggest the framing be fragmentation a] generally, for context of the discussion, and b] re: names and numbers, and ICANN's contributions to mitigating/managing.
> The text below relates only to b] but the inputs you mention pertain to a]. So perhaps balance across.
> > As we know, there has been concern about the single root, about
> > universal acceptance of IDN ad other new gTLDs, about demands for
> > Country Internet Registries, amongst a lot of other things.
> One of the things worth flagging here might be blocking?
> > This part of
> > the session is aimed at stimulating a good discussion about these issues
> > in the ICANN Community. Several inputs are proposed to trigger discussions:
> >
> > Inputs:
> > WEF - fragmentation paper (presented by Bill Drake?)
> I can overview the debate and issues addressed by the paper and by other sources
> > OECD debate on this topic - with possible topics of discussions in the
> > forthcoming meeting in Cancun. (Presented by who?)
> > The process of the World Internet Conference (WIC), Wuzhen Summit
> > (Presented by who?)
> Wolfgang?
> > Other Contexts in the names and numbers (Presented by who?)
> Avri or someone else GNSOish who can overview issues related to acceptance, conflicts, blocking, etc?
> Conversation starters should shoot for under 15 min together and then open to floor for 15+. Will be cramped but maybe could still plant a few seeds...
> Best
> Bill
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20160211/82701468/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list