[ccwg-internet-governance] Follow-up to Call of 9 Feb 2016

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Thu Feb 11 04:28:00 UTC 2016


Both good suggestions.

Sam has a very wide view and is one of the more neutral observers there are.

avri

On 10-Feb-16 16:10, farzaneh badii wrote:
>  I have two suggestions: 
>
> 1. I suggest we invite Sam Dickinson to our panel to talk about
> WSIS+10 . Sam is a great writer and speaker and has been very much
> involved with the process. 
>
> 2. To have a new voice, face, perspective I suggest we ask one of the
> veteran ICANN fellows alumni who has been involved with IG to speak
> about one of the topics either fragmentation or WSIS+10. If you agree,
> I send the email to alumni list and see who will be interested.
>
> Just suggestions not a point of argument - you can either take them or
> leave them. 
>
> Best
>
> Farzaneh 
>
> On 10 February 2016 at 21:56, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
> <mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hello Olivier
>
>     See inline 
>
>     On 10 February 2016 at 20:49, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
>     <ocl at gih.com <mailto:ocl at gih.com>> wrote:
>     >
>     > Dear Farzaneh,
>     >
>     > my comments inline:
>     >
>     > On 10/02/2016 18:59, farzaneh badii wrote:
>     > > Wolfgang is not a board member anymore .
>     >
>     > I never said he was.
>     >
>     > >
>
>     It wasn't addressed to you, it was addressed to Marilyn. I think
>     she missed the Dublin meeting so she was not aware that Wolfgang's
>     term has ended. 
>     >
>     >  
>     >
>     > > And why do we have to steer away the discussion about Wuzhen and
>     > > ICANN? This is not about Fadi. It is about ICANN being represented
>     > > there and if it is ok for ICANN to continue its
>     representation.... so
>     > > if it comes up , why not discuss it ?
>     >
>     > Is ICANN represented there? What do you mean by "represented"? ICANN
>     > representatives take part in many meetings from UN related
>     meetings to
>     > local IGFs etc. I don't think this WG has any way to dictate
>     this. On
>     > the other hand, if "represented" means ICANN representatives leading
>     > initiatives on behalf of ICANN, that might be another story. I see a
>     > different from participating in an initiative and leading an
>     initiative.
>
>     Olivier, UN and local IGFs are by no means comparable to this
>     specific conference and I don't think I should elaborate
>     further. This is just a bad analogy. I believe   as a matter of
>     principle if a community member at the ig session  wants to
>     question the participation of Icann at this conference  should be
>     able to do so and should receive a response and not be steered away. 
>      
>     >
>     >
>     > Kindest regards,
>     >
>     > Olivier
>     >
>
>     -- 
>     Farzaneh
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Farzaneh
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list