[ccwg-internet-governance] Follow-up to Call of 9 Feb 2016
marilynscade at hotmail.com
Thu Feb 11 14:27:40 UTC 2016
Of course, ICANN staff should be in attendance and involved in such discussions.
Not sure that was what was being proposed, though.
> To: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> From: avri at acm.org
> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 23:30:11 -0500
> Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Follow-up to Call of 9 Feb 2016
> On 10-Feb-16 17:06, Nigel Hickson wrote:
> > so when the ITU or UN is discussing critical Internet resources we (as
> > staff) should not be involved?
> this would seem weird and be a bit of a pity;
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ccwg-internet-governance