[ccwg-internet-governance] CCWG Internet Governance Face to Face working group session in Marrakesh

Young-eum Lee yesunhoo at gmail.com
Sun Feb 21 07:21:57 UTC 2016


Olivier, Marilyn,

Thanks +1 for summarizing the list of topics and for the suggestion of the
summary of activities. That should help us focus our discussion on much
more specific and substantial issues.

- kind regards,
- Young-eum.


Young-eum Lee
Dept. of Media Arts & Sciences <http://mas.knou.ac.kr/>, Korea National
Open University <http://www.knou.ac.kr/>
Dept. of Media Arts and Visual Contents <http://macgrad.knou.ac.kr/>, KNOU
Grad School <http://grad.knou.ac.kr/>
ICANN <http://www.icann.org/> ccNSO <http://ccnso.icann.org/> Council member
<http://ccnso.icann.org/council-members.htm>


On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com>
wrote:

> thanks very much for this, Olivier
>
> Might I propose that ICANN staff provide a bullet summary of the
> activities of the CCWG-IG since its inception, that might include
>
> frequency of meetings - how many have we held and when
> frequency of conf. calls - how many have we held
> Public Sessions held at ICANN and what the topics were, including the
> initial "town hall" we held re NM
> Perhaps statistics on attendance at face to face working sessions in terms
> of numbers
> Any other "public" events organized [e.g. the WSIS Forum workshop, etc]
>
> While some of us may have institutional memory, really a sort of work at a
> glance would be helpful to all, I think
>
> M
>
>
> ------------------------------
> To: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> From: ocl at gih.com
> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 02:17:06 +0100
> Subject: [ccwg-internet-governance] CCWG Internet Governance Face to Face
> working group session in Marrakesh
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> this thread is to discuss specifically the F2F Working Group Session on
> Wednesday @ 10.45am local time.
>
> So far, we have two topics:
>
> 1. WSIS Forum Workshop Preparation. (20 minutes)
> - refine topic
> - pick panellists and moderator
> - pick flow
>
> 2. Discussion on the Purpose of the Working Group and Effectiveness in
> providing guidance to Staff. (40 minutes)
>
> Based on the WG's operation since its inception, has the CCWG IG
> delivered on its charter? As a new CEO takes office at ICANN, a F2F
> discussion on this topic would greatly benefit the CCWG IG in planning
> for its future. Can improvements be made?
>
> May I suggest that 2 topics are absolutely enough for a 1 hour meeting?
> Next, as was suggested to increase the "productivity" in advance ofthis
> session, can we please all voice our expectations on the deliverables of
> the discussion of this second topic? Without a regular review of our
> activities, the CCWG IG would not evolve, but I am reticent to re-hash old
> circular discussions so it might be a good idea to set ourselves a goal
> beforehand.
>
> Kindest regards,
>
> Olivier
>
>
> _______________________________________________ ccwg-internet-governance
> mailing list ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20160221/7debff77/attachment.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list