[ccwg-internet-governance] Update on Marrakech agendas

Lynn St.Amour Lynn at internet-matters.org
Mon Feb 29 15:07:35 UTC 2016


Hi Marilyn, all,

I will not be in Marrakech (unfortunately as it is a beautiful city and I will miss seeing all of you in person).  

If Ambassador Fonseca is not attending and gender balance is needed, Marilyn would be great given all she has done re WSIS+10.

Best,

Lyn 


> On Feb 29, 2016, at 9:30 AM, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I co organized the WSIS+10 session at IGF and also in NYGA with Am. Fonseca, and Lynn St Amour  co moderated both with him.
> 
> If she is coming, she could bring some gender presence to the speakers. 
> 
> I propose first Am. Fonseca, if he is attending [I am trying to reach him to confirm] and Lynn St. Amour as back up.
> 
> I am also attending. 
> 
> From: ocl at gih.com
> To: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 15:41:05 +0100
> Subject: [ccwg-internet-governance] Update on Marrakech agendas
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> our last CCWG IG call focussed on finalising the agendas of our WG Face to Face and Public meetings in Marrakech. Please find the two agendas attached, along with the current speakers.
> 
> Public Meeting
> 
> You will note that we are still looking for a speaker on WSIS+10. If you have suggestions please email me.
> 
> The flow for the WSIS+10 process is pretty straight forward as it will mostly be informational. People need to come away with a better understanding of those processes and it would be interesting to learn from the audience to what extent should ICANN take part in these processes.
> 
> When it comes to the discussion about fragmentation v. openness the aims are as follows:
> 
> Aim 1: educate
> Based on the topic - what is in it for each of our communities?
> Action points for each of our communities? How does fragmentation affect ICANN?
> 
> Aim 2: 
> 
> Should ICANN engage in this process? How?
> 
> The main aim to is get participants to understand fragmentation better. The angle of Universal Acceptance of all TLDs is particularly important.
> 
> GAC HLM takeway -- protocol will be worked out to define who will provide the 5 minute update.
> 
> 
> F2F Meeting
> 
> This is self explanatory (see agenda). Staff are working on attempting to get as many statistics s possible to give us interesting starting point when it comes to the CCWG IG's achievements so far.
> 
> Kindest regards,
> 
> Olivier
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ ccwg-internet-governance mailing list ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance



More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list