[ccwg-internet-governance] IGF 2016 Proposal proposed Agenda

farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
Mon Sep 5 12:56:34 UTC 2016


Fine with me.

On 5 September 2016 at 14:52, matthew shears <mshears at cdt.org> wrote:

> Thanks Olivier - works for me.
>
> On 05/09/2016 13:39, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
>
> Thanks Marilyn.
>
> as many people still do not know at this stage whether they'll be able to
> attend IGF in person, we probably have to amend the speaker line-up closer
> to the date. All speakers currently listed have confirmed their provisional
> participation. I'd be reticent to add more... but if some inform us of
> their inability to attend in person, we'll need to look for replacements.
> Kindest regards,
>
> Olivier
>
> On 05/09/2016 16:10, Marilyn Cade wrote:
>
> Looks good.
>
> Don't you also need to offer any changes to the line up of speakers?
>
> M
>
> ------------------------------
> To: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> From: ocl at gih.com
> Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 20:22:33 +0300
> Subject: [ccwg-internet-governance] IGF 2016 Proposal proposed Agenda
>
> Dear all,
>
> following up on the thread below, we have until Tuesday 6 September 2016
> to update the agenda.
>
> Are you okay with the following agenda which Matthew, Rafik and I
> extrapolated from the initial roundtable proposal?
>
> --- cut here ---
>
> 1. Introduction - (Matthew Shears - 5 minutes)
>
> 2. Brief Update on CCWG Accountability (10 minutes)
> - how CWG IANA, CCWG Accountability Work Stream 1 (WS1) and CCWG
> Accountability Work Stream 2 (WS2) fit together
> - update on WS2 sub-topics
>
> 3. Stakeholder Involvement (30 minutes)
> Each stakeholder represented in the round table will share their personal
> and stakeholder experiences in the WGs, etc., drawing attention to the
> processes, tools and methodologies used.
> - assessment of the model?
> - portability of the model?
> - Have we learnt anything from the WS1 process? Are we applying
> improvements to WS2?
>
> 4. Debate - from discussion to decision - is this model portable to other
> fora? (40 minutes)
> As decisions are hard to make in a bottom-up multistakeholder system, is
> the model used in CCWG Accountability portable to other fora?
>
> 5. Wrap up (Matthew Shears - 5 minutes)
>
> --- cut here ---
>
> Kindest regards,
>
> Olivier
>
>
> On 25/08/2016 18:14, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> following up on the IGF proposal, I checked the CCWG IG email archives and
> was under the impression that Nigel had sent the update to the mailing
> list.... but could not find it.
> Please find the confirmation below that our workshop
> https://www.intgovforum.org/cms/igf2016/index.php/proposal/view_public/64
> has been accepted for the IGF 2016 meeting.
> In response to the questions in the text:
>
>
> *From:* IGF <IGF at unog.ch>
> *Date:* 3 August 2016 at 14:11:06 GMT+2
> *To:* <nigel.hickson at icann.org>, <dierdre.sidjanski at icann.org>
> *Subject:* *Status of Your IGF 2016 Workshop Proposal*
>
> Dear Mr. NIGEL HICKSON,
>
> Thank you for submitting workshop proposal #64, “A Post IANA Transition
> ICANN ”, to be considered for the 11th Annual IGF Meeting to be held in
>  Guadalajara, Mexico.
>
> The Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG) has reviewed all submitted
> workshop proposals. Following this review, we are pleased to inform you
> that  your workshop proposal, “A Post IANA Transition ICANN ”, was accepted
> for the IGF 2016 meeting.
> Editing of proposals is re-enabled via *this link*
> <https://www.intgovforum.org/cms/igf2016/index.php/user/login> and we
> kindly ask you to further update your proposal with the following
> information *by 2 September 2016*:
>
> 1.  a complete list of the panellists, with as many “confirmed” as
> possible;
> 2.  an agenda of the workshop;
>
>
> - a complete list of panellists -- I think that we already have that
> worked out.
> - an agenda for the workshop - this needs to be worked out. I propose a
> similar format to our past workshops:
>
> The agenda we followed for IGF2015 about IANA Stewardship Transition was:
>
> 1. Introductions
> 2. The IANA Transition process - comments from respondents and delegates
> 3. Accountability process - comments from respondents and delegates
> 4. Related issues; WSIS; IGF Mandate;
> 5. General discussion
> 6. Summary
>
> Proposed agenda for IGF 2016:
>
> 1. Introductions
> 2. The IANA Transition process - epilogue from respondents and delegates
> (includes comments on ICANN Accountability requirements for IANA
> Stewardship Transition)
> 3. Accountability process - from Work Stream 1 to Work Stream 2. How do
> you make an organisation accountable?
> 4. General discussion
> 5. Summary
>
> Please comment on this. We also need to choose a moderator.
>
>
>
> Furthermore, please find below the comments made by the MAG during
> evaluation to help you further refine and update your proposal:
>
>
>    <Same as 63? One of them should go, but this looks like a duplicate
>    workshop.
>
>
> There appears to have been an error where both workshops had the same
> text. This is fixed now. #63 is about new gTLDs.
>
>
>
>    ICANN has already its proper space. it is better to keep the floor for
>    other entities
>
>
> This comment appears to have been made about the organisation requesting
> the workshop, not the topic of the workshop itself.
>
>
>
>
>
>    Very relevant and timely issue, but which could be maybe addressed in
>    a different type of session, for instance in Day 0.>
>
>
> I wonder whether this is the case. Not being deeply knowledgeable about
> the pros/cons of a day 0 session, I'll let others here comment.
>
> Kindest regards,
>
> Olivier
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Please note that failure to provide the aforementioned updates by the *indicated
> deadline of 2 September 2016* may result in a reallocation of your
> workshop slot.
>
> We thank you for your continued engagement in the IGF process and we look
> forward to working together toward a successful 11th IGF. For further
> information, please do not hesitate to contact us by email at
> *IGF at unog.ch* <IGF at unog.ch>.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> IGF Secretariat
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing listccwg-internet-governance at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>
> --
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhDhttp://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________ ccwg-internet-governance
> mailing list ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>
> --
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhDhttp://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing listccwg-internet-governance at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>
> --
> --------------
> Matthew Shears
> Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
> Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)+ 44 771 2472987
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>


-- 
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20160905/0ee9fe0f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list