[ccwg-internet-governance] IGF 2017: Call for Workshop Proposals

farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
Mon Apr 3 15:45:50 UTC 2017


Marilyn,

the CCWG-IG meeting has been arranged for 4th April. I will forward you
Desiree' meeting invitation separately.

Best
Farzaneh
​​






_______________________________________________
ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance


Farzaneh

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com>
wrote:

> I can do a call on Thursday, April 4. I cannot do a call 31 March, as I am
> in Afghanistan at IGFA's launch.
>
>
> I saw other times offered, and some of them are conflictual for me. I
> regret this.
>
>
> I wonder if we can get more guidance to the ICANN staff, Olivier, as I
> keep seeing little challenges on stuff like this
>
> creates challenges for those who are most committed to discussions.
>
>
> I will gently ask that you not say that a woman who is asking for a needed
> process is being "persistent". That is  actually sort of a demeaning word
> for why a woman who is asking for what should be happening would be
> acknowledged.
>
>
> :-) I am not speaking for any other woman. I am merely commenting for
> myself. Let me just say this:
>
>
> If a man had reminded you/us, you would have said: thanks, yes, thanks for
> the follow up. Am on it.
>
> You would not have said: YOU are persistent. this is a gentle comment, and
> again, Farzi may not agree with me. BUT,
>
> I did a lot of research about women's role in adult conversation while in
> Grad school, and
>
>
> I just returned from Afghanistan so maybe I am extraordinarily sensitive.
> but...
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 29, 2017 4:50 AM
> *To:* farzaneh badii; Marilyn Cade
> *Cc:* CCWG
>
> *Subject:* Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] IGF 2017: Call for Workshop
> Proposals
>
> Dear Farzaneh,
>
> thanks for your follow-up and persistence in this matter. I am surprised
> the ball hasn't been picked up yet and a call set-up asap. By this email, I
> am asking Desiree Cabrera to set-up a Doodle for Friday 31st March, Monday
> 3 and Tuesday 4 April.
> To everyone on the mailing list, if there is a day to avoid altogether,
> please email me and we'll amend the timings.
> Kindest regards,
>
> Olivier
>
> On 27/03/2017 19:26, farzaneh badii wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Can we arrange an adobe meeting to prepare  an IGF proposal?
>
> Thanks
>
> Farzaneh
>
> Farzaneh
>
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> excellent idea, Farzi.
>>
>>
>> M
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, March 18, 2017 3:44 PM
>>
>> *To:* Marilyn Cade
>> *Cc:* Nigel Hickson; CCWG
>> *Subject:* Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] IGF 2017: Call for Workshop
>> Proposals
>>
>> Hello Marilyn. Thanks for the kind words.
>>
>> I think it's too early to know who will definitely be going. Let talk
>> about substance first and based on that we will discuss the speakers list.
>>
>> We have always submitted workshop proposals. We can do this time too, and
>> if it gets rejected then we can hold something on day zero. I suggest
>> having a meeting to discuss IGF proposals as well as other CCWG-IG
>> activities and events.
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks so much, Farzi.
>>>
>>>
>>> I wonder if we might do a quick check on who can attend each of those in
>>> person [just with a prediction}, so that also
>>>
>>> we can design any workshops with the eye to inclusion of remote
>>> participants.
>>>
>>>
>>> I was disappointed that we missed you, Farzi, and others in person in
>>> ICANN, and also at the IGF consultation, we are missing some voices, due to
>>> various challenges.
>>>
>>>
>>> For any workshop that CCWG-IG might propose, and I'd like to propose
>>> that CCWG-IG examine the benefit of a Day Zero event, which will mean more
>>> assurance that there is an opportunity, as the MAG approval of workshops of
>>> over 250-300 workshops means a very high probability of rejection of
>>> multiple workshops from the same sources. Also, there are a lot of MAG
>>> members and MAG members are prohibited from proposing workshops and rating
>>> those that are from their organizations.
>>>
>>> BUT, a Day Zero event would be an excellent time slot to consider, in my
>>> view, IF the CCWG-IG wanted to undertake a session and had a relevant
>>> approach that is in concert with the theme of the IGF2017.
>>>
>>>
>>> Finally, I also want to raise a topic with Nigel. ICANN often does a
>>> joint I* reception. Another attraction might be to ensure that all of the
>>> CCWG-IG attendees are invited, but also to have ICANN acknowledge [just 30
>>> sec] attendees from the ICANN community at IGF2017. Just a show of hands,
>>> followed by applause and even perhaps a group picture during ICANN's Open
>>> Forum.
>>>
>>>
>>> M
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 17, 2017 8:24 PM
>>> *To:* Marilyn Cade
>>> *Cc:* Nigel Hickson; CCWG
>>>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] IGF 2017: Call for Workshop
>>> Proposals
>>>
>>> No my comment is about IGF workshop proposal. Ccwg-ig has submitted IGF
>>> proposals before through Nigel.  Nothing has changed.  We need meetings for
>>> both igf proposal and discussing ccwg ig activities (if any) during WSIS.
>>>
>>> On 17 Mar 2017 17:11, "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Just to clarify: a) the workshop notification from Nigel is about IGF
>>> workshops. I  am not sure why, at this point, CCWG-IG would propose a
>>> workshop for IGF2017. There are typically over 250 workshop proposals, and
>>> MAG members cannot themselves propose workshops, and must recuse themselves
>>> from evaluating any workshop that their organization is involved in. ICANN
>>> has the option themselves of an open forum, and some other parts of the
>>> ICANN stakeholders members have submitted workshop proposals.
>>>
>>>
>>> I thought that Nigel was announcing IGF workshop process, but I think
>>> that Farzaneh's comment is about the WSIS Forum workshop.
>>>
>>>
>>> If I am right, different topics and of course both deserve open
>>> discussion abut not on the same string. Can we separate them, please?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org <
>>> ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of farzaneh badii
>>> <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 17, 2017 12:16 PM
>>> *To:* Nigel Hickson
>>> *Cc:* ccwg
>>> *Subject:* Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] IGF 2017: Call for Workshop
>>> Proposals
>>>
>>> Thank you Nigel. can we have a meeting with all the interested members
>>> and participants and come up with a description of the workshop proposal
>>> and decide on the speakers?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Farzaneh
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Nigel Hickson <nigel.hickson at icann.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Colleagues
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Good afternoon to all; was good meeting so many folks in Copenhagen
>>>> (ICANN 58); and welcome to new folks on list.
>>>>
>>>> Pursuant to our discussion on the IGF 2017 during the IG Public session
>>>> yesterday can confirm that the Call for workshop proposals has been posted
>>>> on the IGF website:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2017-cal
>>>> l-for-workshop-proposals[intgovforum.org]
>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.intgovforum.org_multilingual_content_igf-2D2017-2Dcall-2Dfor-2Dworkshop-2Dproposals&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=RrrXyaBfa00GH1liTedM3FwobVakuhJ-qs1N8-Ji8VE&m=FshODJxl98OXqdeTnodRRchg5i4EzjuFf9hjU5Lg9P4&s=LKXgL5IVqt8Oky8GpzJWmLv_wpXCe8eUDjq3S64o6l0&e=>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The online form will become live on *31 March*.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The deadline for submission is  *3 May, 2017 *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nigel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
>>>> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing listccwg-internet-governance at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>
> --
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhDhttp://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20170403/6137ea8a/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list