[ccwg-internet-governance] [Ext] Re: Open consultation for ITU CWG-I
nigel.hickson at icann.org
Thu Aug 3 23:18:33 UTC 2017
Marilyn and Jim
Good evening and many thanks. To my knowledge the CCWG IG have not discussed this consultation (though was mentioned at ICANN 59). The ICANN Organisation is considering a response and, as previously for these matters, is consulting membership for views.
By “singularity” was (as Marilyn notes) was referring to a singular DNS (perhaps I could have been clearer).
From: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com>
Date: Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 22:47
To: Jim Prendergast <jim at GALWAYSG.COM>, Nigel Hickson <nigel.hickson at icann.org>, ccwg <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] Re: Open consultation for ITU CWG-I
I am not responding for Nigel but I assume -- to be corrected -- a single unique Internet root.
After all, we did fight that off with Site Finder and various other weird challenges.
And, I just posted that I support ICANN responding.
For anyone not following scary ITU and UN discussions, maybe we can up that ante and have an informational call.
From: ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org <ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Jim Prendergast <jim at GALWAYSG.COM>
Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 1:41 PM
To: Nigel Hickson; ccwg
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Open consultation for ITU CWG-I
Hi Nigel. Thanks for highlighting this. I do have a few questions.
Is this meant to be an ICANN Organization submission or a CCWG-I submission?
For either scenario, Has a decision been made to definitely respond to the consultation? If so how and when did that happen?
I'm trying to get a sense of how this group consults with their various constituencies on what is a very complicated and politically charged topic/consultation in time to formulate a response if a response is to be submitted.
And finally what do you mean by "singularity of the Internet?"
From: ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Nigel Hickson
Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 10:05 AM
To: ccwg <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
Subject: [ccwg-internet-governance] Open consultation for ITU CWG-I
Good afternoon. At the ITU Council in June there was an agreement to go ahead with the two consultations (which the Working Group had been unable to agree on).
Thus, the next open consultation for the ITU Council Working Group on Internet (CWG-I) is now open. The deadline for submitting a contribution is August 19 and the open consultation will be in Geneva on September 18.
The next open consultation, which will be held late January/early February will be “bridging the gender divide.
The questions asked for the OTT Topic are:
Public Policy considerations for OTTs
"Considering the rapid development of information and communications technology (ICT) which led to the advent of Internet-based services commonly known as "over-the-top" (hereafter: OTT), all stakeholders are invited to submit their inputs on the following key aspects from policy perspective:
1. What are the opportunities and implications associated with OTT?
2. What are the policy and regulatory matters associated with OTT?
3. How do the OTT players and other stakeholders offering app services contribute in aspects related to security, safety and privacy of the consumer?
4. What approaches might be considered regarding OTT to help the creation of environment in which all stakeholders are able to prosper and thrive?
5. How can OTT players and operators best cooperate at local and international level? Are there model partnership agreements that could be developed?"
Given the breadth of what are considered (in this context) to be “Internet based Services” we are minded to briefly contribute to this consultation noting the importance of ensuring that any policy, or even regulatory approaches, maintain the openness and singularity of the Internet.
Would, as ever, be grateful for any inputs to any (or all) of these questions by 16th August.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4587 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ccwg-internet-governance