[ccwg-internet-governance] GNSO council motion on CCWG-IG

Rafik Dammak rafik.dammak at gmail.com
Fri Aug 25 13:28:15 UTC 2017

Hi Marilyn,

thanks, no need to re-volunteer. it is the same group :)



2017-08-25 22:25 GMT+09:00 Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com>:

> Thanks, Rafik.
> Do I need to re-volunteer?
> I did so earlier. but if I need to re-volunteer, I do so.
> M
> ------------------------------
> *From:* ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org <
> ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Rafik Dammak <
> rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, August 25, 2017 3:49 AM
> *To:* ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> *Subject:* [ccwg-internet-governance] GNSO council motion on CCWG-IG
> hi all,
> GNSO council had a motion regarding CCWG-IG as result of discussion about
> the future of the working group during the last months. We also had
> discussion during F2F in Johannesburg on the related issued raised by GNSO.
> The motion was passed unanimously yesterday  https://community.icann.org/
> display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+24+August+2017  . It tasks us as
> group to propose a new vehicle to replace the current structure in coming
> months. Please find below some of relevant "resolved" items:
> "3. The GNSO Council requests that members of the CCWG-IG and others
> interested parties come together to explore a framework / model that more
> fully addresses the concerns that have been expressed by the GNSO Council,
> and submit this framework / model to the GNSO Council for its consideration
> at the Council meeting mid-way between ICANN 60 and ICANN 61 (e.g. February
> GNSO Council meeting).
> 4. To facilitate the work as requested under Resolved clause #3, allowing
> for a reasonable time to coordinate with other SOs and ACs to develop a new
> structure, and to ensure there is no gap between the retirement of the
> CCWG-IG and the establishment of its successor group, the GNSO Council
> shall withdraw as a Chartering Organization from the CCWG-IG effective at
> the conclusion of ICANN 61 in San Juan, expecting that a replacement
> structure will be ready for approval by the Council at that time."
> As agreed in previous call, we asked for volunteers to join a small to
> work on the proposal based on the requrirements and concerns we heard. Now,
> we have a clear deadline by when we should deliver our work.
> Best,
> Rafik
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20170825/9db6cbd5/attachment.html>

More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list