[ccwg-internet-governance] ITU - EXPERT GROUP ON THE REVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION REGULATIONS (EG-ITRs)
Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
ocl at gih.com
Tue Jan 3 11:45:57 UTC 2017
I agree with Patrik. In fact, should we mention that should any of the
ITRs touch on aspect of running the Internet including the coordination
of the Internet identifiers, that's crossing a red line which makes any
work, discussion, preparation and funding of such a conference
absolutely futile? Should we be clear on this from the outset, so as to
avoid an abominable waste of money and time for all concerned?
Olivier -- member of the UK delegation at the 2012 WCIT
On 03/01/2017 12:31, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> Dear Nigel,
> Thank you for this information.
> I think it would be also good to explicitly look at the reasons why so many did choose to not sign the 2012 ITRs, as I think ITU should have as a goal to get a higher number of signatories in the next round and not lower.
> Patrik -- member of the Swedish delegation at the 2012 WCIT
> On 3 Jan 2017, at 12:08, Nigel Hickson wrote:
>> Good morning. As I think was briefly mentioned on last Call, the ITU (pursuant to a decision of the 2014 Plenipotentiary) has established an Expert Group to look at a potential revision to the ITRs adopted in 2012.
>> An overview is at following link.
>> The Review (on which contributions are called for) will include, among others:
>> 1. an examination of the 2012 ITRs to determine its applicability in a rapidly evolving international telecommunication environment, taking into account technology, services and existing multilateral and international legal obligations as well as changes in the scope of domestic regulatory regimes;
>> 2. Legal analyses of the 2012 ITRs;
>> 4. Analyses of any potential conflicts between the obligations of signatories to the 2012 ITRs and signatories to the 1988 ITRs with respect to implementation of the provisions of the 1988 and the 2012 ITRs.
>> ICANN is planning to attend the initial meeting which takes place in Geneva on 9/10th February. Any views ahead of that on the three questions above would be most welcome. Perhaps we might discuss on a Call in advance.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the ccwg-internet-governance