[ccwg-internet-governance] NTIA: NOTICE OF ENQUIRY "INTERNATIONAL INTERNET POLICY PRIORITIES"

Javier Rua javrua at gmail.com
Tue Jul 24 21:45:16 UTC 2018


Agree with Marilyn 100%.


Javier Rúa-Jovet

+1-787-396-6511
twitter: @javrua
skype: javier.rua1
https://www.linkedin.com/in/javrua 


> On Jul 24, 2018, at 5:19 PM, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I read the submissions, as I am sure others did.
> 
> I suggest that we focus only on those that are relevant to ICANN and related IG activities.  
> There was no significant, or even credible objection to the ICANN IANA transition. Let's not get diverted by that, please, as a topic. 
> 
> But let's do focus on those areas that may affect ICANN externally, including the IGF.
> 
> M
> 
> 
> From: ccwg-internet-governance <ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 4:56 PM
> To: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] NTIA: NOTICE OF ENQUIRY "INTERNATIONAL INTERNET POLICY PRIORITIES"
>  
> NTIA has published the comments received on its Internet Priorities.
> 
> https://www.ntia.doc.gov/federal-register-notice/2018/comments-international-internet-policy-priorities
> 
>> On 07/06/2018 18:47, Nigel Hickson wrote:
>>  
>> 
>> Colleagues
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Good evening.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I suspect many of you will have seen this. https://regmedia.co.uk/2018/06/05/ntia-internet-policy-noi-jun18.pdf which was in the Federal Register on 5th June.  Perhaps of most interest to the CCWG IG are the questions on Internet Governance (see below) including at D a question on the IANA Transition and at H on the IGF.  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Best
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Nigel  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> II. Multistakeholder Approach to
>> 
>> Internet Governance
>> 
>> A. Does the multistakeholder
>> 
>> approach continue to support an
>> 
>> environment for the internet to grow
>> 
>> and thrive? If so, why? If not, why not?
>> 
>> B. Are there public policy areas in
>> 
>> which the multistakeholder approach
>> 
>> works best? If yes, what are those areas
>> 
>> and why? Are there areas in which the
>> 
>> multistakeholder approach does not
>> 
>> work effectively? If there are, what are
>> 
>> those areas and why?
>> 
>> C. Are the existing accountability
>> 
>> structures within multistakeholder
>> 
>> internet governance sufficient? If not,
>> 
>> why not? What improvements can be
>> 
>> made?
>> 
>> D. Should the IANA Stewardship
>> 
>> Transition be unwound? If yes, why and
>> 
>> how? If not, why not?
>> 
>> E. What should be NTIA’s priorities
>> 
>> within ICANN and the GAC?
>> 
>> F. Are there any other DNS related
>> 
>> activities NTIA should pursue? If yes,
>> 
>> please describe.
>> 
>> G. Are there barriers to engagement at
>> 
>> the IGF? If so, how can we lower these
>> 
>> barriers?
>> 
>> H. Are there improvements that can
>> 
>> be made to the IGF’s structure,
>> 
>> organization, planning processes, or
>> 
>> intercessional work programs? If so,
>> 
>> what are they?
>> 
>> I. What, if any, action can NTIA take
>> 
>> to help raise awareness about the IGF
>> 
>> and foster stakeholder engagement?
>> 
>> J. What role should multilateral
>> 
>> organizations play in internet
>> 
>> governance?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
>> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
> 
> -- 
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20180724/723d38b6/attachment.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list