[ccwg-internet-governance] CCWG-IG call of Friday, May 23

Marilyn Cade marilynscade at hotmail.com
Thu May 24 15:32:35 UTC 2018


No, darlin'. the LAST Brazil IGF -- 2015.

M


________________________________
From: Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 11:26 AM
To: Marilyn Cade; ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] CCWG-IG call of Friday, May 23

Dear Marilyn,

please be so kind to find my comments/questions inline:

On 23/05/2018 20:56, Marilyn Cade wrote:
[...]


I made a proposal that the Wshop proposal be a town hall to take stock of achievements to date on key issues identified in early days, and a modification was offered to add in looking ahead  to such topics as IA, IOT, Big Data, etc.

Understood, but I would feel more at ease if we were to still retain an ICANN angle to these discussions. As others have asked, is it in the remit of this working group to discuss general Internet Governance? How general? Our past workshops at IGF have always had an ICANN flavour to them: https://community.icann.org/x/fw6OAw<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.icann.org%2Fx%2Ffw6OAw&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cbeddc15f2faf48a08c1c08d5c18ab4ab%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636627723830364093&sdata=WQSo1e%2FLqVvkylj6f6zYGWaX0lryl6crdEB0%2BAcHmXE%3D&reserved=0>
Sometimes I think that it is *because* the group making the proposal is an ICANN Community group discussing ICANN related topics in a wider setting, that our workshop proposals score high. Could there be a chance that being too general and disconnected from ICANN might not serve us well?

[...]


BUT, if we move forward on this CCWG _ IG, I'd like to propose that we invite the two senior Ambassadors who attended in Brazil as co moderators and do a looking back and looking ahead 90 minute workshop, but without panelists, using the NetMundial 'from the floor' approach.


Do you mean Brazil IGF in 2007? 2006 IGF was in Athens. Do you have their name/contact details so we could check with them?

Kindest regards,

Olivier
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20180524/af8981fd/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list