[ccwg-internet-governance] Scheduling meetings at ICANN63

farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
Wed Oct 10 05:42:27 UTC 2018


For the F2F the description says that you want to brief the crowd about the
CCEG charter. Last thing I found about the charter from you is here:

Can you please also brief the members of this CCWG-IG? Sorry I know I am
back from the dead, I regained my ability to travel and really thought it
would be a shame not to follow up on this group. I used to be NCSG rep, but
GNSO  is not the chartering org anymore so I would like to know how you are
progressing with this charter. Was it sent to GNSO Council? You said in
your August email:

"The plan is that once the responses are sent to the ccNSO Chair, a copy
of this response will also be sent to the GNSO Chair +Vice Chairs. This
should trigger a discussion between the two SOs, if their so desire, and
we are hoping to receive further replies concerning suggested amendments.

As a kind reminder, an action item from the Panama Face to Face meeting
was to complete the transition from CCWG to a CCEG Charter by, or at the
ICANN Barcelona meeting."

Was the charter sent to CCNSO and GNSO? Are GNSO and CCNSO talking
about it? Will they talk about it in Barcelona? I'll be sad if this
group doesn't meet its deadline for finalizing the charter. I think we
started some time ago.

Can we know what we will be talking about with the Board?

By the way ... I think some people are ahead of us in discussing
IGO/UN/National initiatives   that might affect ICANN :)


Can we set an agenda?


On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 1:20 AM farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>

> Hi
> I would like to know who is on the first panel. and I would like to see a
> description that can attract those who are not automatically attracted to
> this session and whom we need to convince not the already convinced.
> "This Session will take a high-level look (and have an equally high-level
> discussion) on external Internet policy issues potentially affecting ICANN,
> whether at UN, ITU or at WIPO. Will also hear more about the High-Level UN
> Panel on Digital Cooperation and the forthcoming 2018 IGF."
> Please name some of these external policy issues that can "potentially"
> affect ICANN. Because saying whether at the UN, ITU or at WIPO is too
> broad. and we have the high-level panel on digital cooperation? This panel
> was convened recently and frankly, I don't see its relevance.
> And I'd like to know your list of speakers. The fate of this group will
> remain uncertain if we don't change our approach. Have we ever invited
> David Kaye to talk about UN, online freedom of speech and ICANN? Have we
> ever invited the UNGGE chair to tell us whether or not their efforts would
> have affected ICANN? (well they are done now but yeah). Then there are
> digital trade agreements and WTO. What are the developments there? Could it
> potentially affect ICANN? No? then lets not talk about it! If yes, lets
> talk about it!
> We have to talk about issues and groups that are more likely to
> make binding decisions through treaties etc that affect ICANN and its
> stakeholders' policy development. High level panels won't have any effect.
> Even a good analysis of NTIA call for comments would be more eye-opening.
> I think we really have to be issue specific instead of venue specific. I
> see ITU in the description. ITU is still functioning?
> Are we gonna talk about data localization its potential effect on DNS and
> IGOs activities with that regard?
> Also I would like to hear from Nigel and other ICANN staff members about
> their participation in these UN/international forums. Is Veni around? What
> is happening up in UN New York Veni? Anything ICANN related?
> I am so glad not to see enhanced cooperation on this agenda!
> And for the F2F, Stay tuned I am coming back with my questions.
> Farzaneh
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 10:41 AM Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> we received a number of emails saying that the proposed times were
>> unsuitable - and could not get the right room availability for the type of
>> meeting we were envisaging.
>> Nigel, Gisella and I have been in frequent interaction with the meetings
>> Team, in what is going to be a very busy ICANN meeting. We have finally
>> managed to find a suitable time/date/place for our two meetings:
>> - CCWG IG Public Meeting
>> Thursday 25 October 2018, 10:30-12:00 Room 114 (ccNSO)
>> https://63.schedule.icann.org/meetings/901774
>> - CCWG IG F2F Meeting
>> Thursday 25 October 2018 12:15-13:30 Room 133
>> https://63.schedule.icann.org/meetings/901775
>> So the meetings will follow each other with a 15 minute break to move
>> from one room to the other.
>> Agendas are in the making and will be proposed soon.
>> Kindest regards,
>> Olivier
>> On 28/08/2018 06:32, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond wrote:
>> Dear colleagues,
>> we are currently working on asking for sessions:
>> - a 90 minute public meeting
>> - a 90 minute F2F meeting where we'll invite the Board Working Group on
>> Internet Governance
>> Currently we are looking at Monday afternoon and Wednesday late afternoon
>> – 17:00-18:30 (after GNSO council meeting). Please let us know ASAP if
>> these time slots might clash with your own schedule.
>> Kindest regards,
>> Olivier
>> _______________________________________________
>> ccwg-internet-governance mailing listccwg-internet-governance at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>> --
>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhDhttp://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>> _______________________________________________
>> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
>> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20181010/8c3267bd/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list