[ccwg-internet-governance] Scheduling meetings at ICANN63

Patrik Fältström paf at frobbit.se
Mon Oct 15 05:01:30 UTC 2018


FWIW, I am a delegate on the Swedish Delegation.

   Patrik

On 15 Oct 2018, at 1:39, Jim Prendergast wrote:

> Thanks Judith but as of this evening, aside from delegation leadership, no one else has  been officially confirmed on the US delegation so I can’t do this. Sorry.
>
> On Oct 14, 2018, at 5:19 PM, Judith Hellerstein <judith at jhellerstein.com<mailto:judith at jhellerstein.com>> wrote:
>
>
> HI Olivier,
>
> Mary Uduma will also be at the Plenipot and I think she is on Nigeria's Government Delegation along with Jimson and so we might ask her to be on the panel..
>
> If you are looking for whom is on the US Del, would also suggest either Keith Drazek or Jim Predergast who are both on the US Delegation to plenipotentiary
>
> Judith
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO
> Hellerstein & Associates
> 3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008
> Phone: (202) 362-5139  Skype ID: judithhellerstein
> Mobile/Whats app: +1202-333-6517
> E-mail: Judith at jhellerstein.com<mailto:Judith at jhellerstein.com>   Website: www.jhellerstein.com<http://www.jhellerstein.com>
> Linked In: www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/<http://www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/>
> Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide
>
>
>
> On 10/14/2018 4:55 PM, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond wrote:
> Dear Farzaneh,
>
> thank you for your follow-up. Please be so kind to find my responses in your text:
>
> On 10/10/2018 17:15, farzaneh badii wrote:
> Hi Olivier
>
> My comments on your agenda:
>
> Discussing what we will do at IGF is not bad. But focusing on that only is not super productive either. I think the topics that could affect ICANN is interesting. So perhaps this could be an angle. As I said it should not be hypothetical  like what if aliens take over ICANN and should be more or less about a law, potential policy, regulation that can affect us directly. I know of two at least.
>
> I agree that taking the time to list what sessions ICANN is organising at IGF is not a good use of our limited time and I propose that we have a WIKI page created for this and just point participants to that WIKI page, linked from the Agenda. In this section, focussing on items that are likely to affect ICANN is wise.
>
> I wish IGF was more about IG this year. But it is not.
>
>
> There is an increased focus on the SDGs which does make it somehow hybrid.
>
>
> And Plenipot. How could I forget this important meeting. I know that some of our ICANN attendees are going. Perhaps we invite them to talk about their plans?
>
> JImson Olufuye will be attending ICANN63, and will also be part of the delegation from Nigeria to the ITU. I wonder if anyone in our group would be on a delegation? For example Jim Prendergast? Or you could suggest anyone else too?
>
>
> I don't know what the enthusiasm about the UN panel is but what can I say.
>
> It's a hot topic at present and since we have the chance of having its secretariat ready to give some information about it, it's an opportunity.
>
>
> As to inviting people from around the world who actually lead processes that might affect us, they usually have their own budget. If they see their work and what they are leading will have a meaningful impact on ICANN if successful they will attend. In the meantime we actually have people who follow those processes we can ask them for an update.
>
> Good point. But then we probably have to be more strategic about these things. The current Damocles sword hanging over this group doesn't help, though, but I would hope that with a confirmation from SOs/ACs that they support the proposed CCEG, we can start anew and be more ambitious when it comes to inviting speakers.
>
>
> It is frustrating when you and  Nigel dont receive much help and feedback is not forthcoming. we don't have to be too ambitious. Every  other meeting we mention  what we have been doing for improving the group's work. This is supposed to be a long term group. I don't think our deliverables and performance should be compared to a pdp.
>
> Once we get into CCEG mode, I am hoping it will be a different state of affairs.
> Kindest regards,
>
> Olivier
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20181015/047f5671/signature.asc>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list