[ccwg-internet-governance] Scheduling meetings at ICANN63

farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
Mon Oct 15 05:06:49 UTC 2018


That is great news! I suggest we have Patrik on the panel.

Farzaneh


On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 1:01 AM Patrik Fältström via
ccwg-internet-governance <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org> wrote:

> FWIW, I am a delegate on the Swedish Delegation.
>
>    Patrik
>
> On 15 Oct 2018, at 1:39, Jim Prendergast wrote:
>
> > Thanks Judith but as of this evening, aside from delegation leadership,
> no one else has  been officially confirmed on the US delegation so I can’t
> do this. Sorry.
> >
> > On Oct 14, 2018, at 5:19 PM, Judith Hellerstein <judith at jhellerstein.com
> <mailto:judith at jhellerstein.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > HI Olivier,
> >
> > Mary Uduma will also be at the Plenipot and I think she is on Nigeria's
> Government Delegation along with Jimson and so we might ask her to be on
> the panel..
> >
> > If you are looking for whom is on the US Del, would also suggest either
> Keith Drazek or Jim Predergast who are both on the US Delegation to
> plenipotentiary
> >
> > Judith
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________________
> > Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO
> > Hellerstein & Associates
> > 3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008
> > Phone: (202) 362-5139  Skype ID: judithhellerstein
> > Mobile/Whats app: +1202-333-6517
> > E-mail: Judith at jhellerstein.com<mailto:Judith at jhellerstein.com>
>  Website: www.jhellerstein.com<http://www.jhellerstein.com>
> > Linked In: www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/<
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/>
> > Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10/14/2018 4:55 PM, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond wrote:
> > Dear Farzaneh,
> >
> > thank you for your follow-up. Please be so kind to find my responses in
> your text:
> >
> > On 10/10/2018 17:15, farzaneh badii wrote:
> > Hi Olivier
> >
> > My comments on your agenda:
> >
> > Discussing what we will do at IGF is not bad. But focusing on that only
> is not super productive either. I think the topics that could affect ICANN
> is interesting. So perhaps this could be an angle. As I said it should not
> be hypothetical  like what if aliens take over ICANN and should be more or
> less about a law, potential policy, regulation that can affect us directly.
> I know of two at least.
> >
> > I agree that taking the time to list what sessions ICANN is organising
> at IGF is not a good use of our limited time and I propose that we have a
> WIKI page created for this and just point participants to that WIKI page,
> linked from the Agenda. In this section, focussing on items that are likely
> to affect ICANN is wise.
> >
> > I wish IGF was more about IG this year. But it is not.
> >
> >
> > There is an increased focus on the SDGs which does make it somehow
> hybrid.
> >
> >
> > And Plenipot. How could I forget this important meeting. I know that
> some of our ICANN attendees are going. Perhaps we invite them to talk about
> their plans?
> >
> > JImson Olufuye will be attending ICANN63, and will also be part of the
> delegation from Nigeria to the ITU. I wonder if anyone in our group would
> be on a delegation? For example Jim Prendergast? Or you could suggest
> anyone else too?
> >
> >
> > I don't know what the enthusiasm about the UN panel is but what can I
> say.
> >
> > It's a hot topic at present and since we have the chance of having its
> secretariat ready to give some information about it, it's an opportunity.
> >
> >
> > As to inviting people from around the world who actually lead processes
> that might affect us, they usually have their own budget. If they see their
> work and what they are leading will have a meaningful impact on ICANN if
> successful they will attend. In the meantime we actually have people who
> follow those processes we can ask them for an update.
> >
> > Good point. But then we probably have to be more strategic about these
> things. The current Damocles sword hanging over this group doesn't help,
> though, but I would hope that with a confirmation from SOs/ACs that they
> support the proposed CCEG, we can start anew and be more ambitious when it
> comes to inviting speakers.
> >
> >
> > It is frustrating when you and  Nigel dont receive much help and
> feedback is not forthcoming. we don't have to be too ambitious. Every
> other meeting we mention  what we have been doing for improving the group's
> work. This is supposed to be a long term group. I don't think our
> deliverables and performance should be compared to a pdp.
> >
> > Once we get into CCEG mode, I am hoping it will be a different state of
> affairs.
> > Kindest regards,
> >
> > Olivier
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> > ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> > ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> > ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20181015/bbf7bc47/attachment.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list