[ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [NRIs List] FW: [IGFmaglist] Call for Feedback to the High-Level Panel on ‎Digital Cooperation Report's Recommendation 5 and the IGF Plus Model

Jennifer Chung jen at registry.asia
Fri Aug 9 16:36:43 UTC 2019


Dear Yeseul and all,

 

The APrIGF community is currently discussing any such regional process (Yeseul, thank you for starting the discussion), and its Synthesis Document process is still underway, with the timeline that coincides with the IGF call.

 

Best,

 

Jennifer

 

From: ccwg-internet-governance [mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Yeseul Kim
Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2019 3:15 AM
To: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com>
Cc: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [NRIs List] FW: [IGFmaglist] Call for Feedback to the High-Level Panel on ‎Digital Cooperation Report's Recommendation 5 and the IGF Plus Model

 

Dear all

 

Regarding the input into UN HLPDC Reports from APAC region, APrIGF and APSIG circulated the info inside the circle but did not open its own regional official input process just like EuroDIG is doing now. APrIGF secretariat must be working with the final APrIGF synthesis document right now but there was no mention on the UN HLPDC on the document either. 

 

In addition to this, I wonder whether counter-terrorism efforts can also be within the interest of CCWG IG.

 

Although I acknowledge that ICANN sticks to the 'technical' aspects of the Internet and thus usually do not let itself too much engaged in the content regulation, etc, Cloudflare, which is also the 'technical' company, recently terminated contracts with 8chan because of the website's alleged involvement in El Paso shooting. And this is the second time for Cloudflare to terminate their contract with any website because of their terrorist contents. The first one was with the Daily Stormer which is still online - I do personally think 8chan will also still be there.

 

So I wish we can review what's happening regarding this topic so that ICANN can also make any timely statements on this if they are needed. As counter-terrorism online is not only the interest of Cloudflare or a small number of tech companies but also within the realm of UN interest and other Internet Forum's interest as well. EC also recently released a proposal for a regulation on preventing the dissemination of terrorist content online. <https://eucrim.eu/articles/commission-proposal-regulation-preventing-dissemination-terrorist-content-online/>   I think it won't hurt ICANN to be aware of what's happening regarding the topic, although I do believe that most of ICANN members are well aware of this movement. 


 


Below are the links to the public statements made by Matthew Prince the CEO of Cloudflare and Global Internet Forum on Counter-Terrorism, which was launched in 2017 as a coalition of tech groups such as Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, etc. 

 

1. Cloudflare's stance on extremists online

https://new.blog.cloudflare.com/why-we-terminated-daily-stormer/

https://new.blog.cloudflare.com/terminating-service-for-8chan/

 

2. Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism 

https://www.gifct.org/

 

 Best,

 Yeseul Kim

 

 

 

 

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 3:26 AM Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com <mailto:marilynscade at hotmail.com> > wrote:

Ben, et all

 

Some of the NRIs are interested in their own input, as the "boiling up" of entities, like EuroDIG and other regional captures only a few of the voices.  

 

Not to be dismissive of such group approaches, but it loses the on ground understanding and perspective. 

 

 Hopefully, you can share perspectives about how the private sector is engaging?  

 

BUT, for the CCWG-IG, perhaps our focus should be whether we can develop approaches that encourage others submitting comments, as it appears that we cannot submit comments as an entity. 

 

Just an idea.

 

Marilyn Cade

 

 

 

  _____  

From: ccwg-internet-governance <ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org> > on behalf of Ben Wallis (CELA) via ccwg-internet-governance <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org> >
Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 2:15 PM
To: Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com <mailto:ocl at gih.com> >; ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>  <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org> >
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [NRIs List] FW: [IGFmaglist] Call for Feedback to the High-Level Panel on ‎Digital Cooperation Report's Recommendation 5 and the IGF Plus Model 

 

I think it’s interesting to note that the slight distinction between the consultations being carried out by regional IGFs and the global IGF on the HLPDC report.

 

As Nigel mentioned yesterday, EuroDIG is inviting comments on the entire HLPDC Report. Comments are invited until 15 September and EuroDIG Secretariat will then produce a synthesis report of responses received. I had understood that other regional IGFs (e.g. Asia-Pacific, Africa) were considering something similar but not sure where they got to. 

 

The global IGF consultation focuses on Recommendation 5 and the proposals for an IGF+ model. This focus is understandable given that these are the parts of the HLPDC report specifically related to the IGF and its possible future functions. 

 

Aside from the global and regional IGF exercises, I am aware that the UN is inviting organizations which provided input ahead of the HLPDC report to provide responses to the report.

 

Ben

 

From: ccwg-internet-governance <ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org> > On Behalf Of Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 9:01 AM
To: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org> 
Subject: [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [NRIs List] FW: [IGFmaglist] Call for Feedback to the High-Level Panel on ‎Digital Cooperation Report's Recommendation 5 and the IGF Plus Model

 

FYI -- we discussed this briefly on our call earlier this week.
Kindest regards,

Olivier



-------- Forwarded Message -------- 


Subject: 

[NRIs List] FW: [IGFmaglist] Call for Feedback to the High-Level Panel on ‎Digital Cooperation Report's Recommendation 5 and the IGF Plus Model


Date: 

Wed, 7 Aug 2019 15:14:04 +0000


From: 

Anja Gengo  <mailto:anja.gengo at un.org> <anja.gengo at un.org>





Dear Colleagues,

 

One of the main sessions at the 14th IGF will be focused on Digital Cooperation and Internet Governance (scheduled for 26 November, 10:00-13:00 CEST, Main Hall). In preparation for this session, the Call for Feedback to the High-Level Panel on ‎Digital Cooperation Report's Recommendation 5 and the IGF Plus Model is now open. 

 

Please review carefully the Report, especially the Recommendation 5 and the IGF Plus Model, and provide your written feedback by 30 September 2019 through the IGF website:  <https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.intgovforum.org%2Fmultilingual%2Fcontent%2Freport-of-the-un-secretary-general%25E2%2580%2599s-%25E2%2580%258Ehigh-level-panel-on-digital-cooperation&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc6c25abae21941aeac3708d71b6340e8%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637007985413506934&sdata=IwvgTckyRM%2FCztWqTUmz%2Ftk88ObflX5PqlqvTaMNWWY%3D&reserved=0> https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/report-of-the-un-secretary-general%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%8Ehigh-level-panel-on-digital-cooperation. All received inputs will be synthesized in a written output document that will be posted in late October as an input to the above-mentioned main session during the 14th IGF in Berlin, where we will facilitate online as well as physical participation.

 

For any questions, please do not hesitate to contact. We would appreciate if you could share this information with your respective networks.

 

Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to let us know.

 

Best regards,

Anja

 

 

From: Chengetai Masango [mailto:chengetai.masango at un.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, 7 August, 2019 4:03 PM
To: MAG-public  <mailto:Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org> <Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
Subject: [IGFmaglist] Call for Feedback to the High-Level Panel on ‎Digital Cooperation Report's Recommendation 5 and the IGF Plus Model

 

Dear All,

 

The the Call for Feedback to the High-Level Panel on ‎Digital Cooperation Report's Recommendation 5 and the IGF Plus Model  is now open. 

 

https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/report-of-the-un-secretary-general%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%8Ehigh-level-panel-on-digital-cooperation <https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.intgovforum.org%2Fmultilingual%2Fcontent%2Freport-of-the-un-secretary-general%25E2%2580%2599s-%25E2%2580%258Ehigh-level-panel-on-digital-cooperation&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc6c25abae21941aeac3708d71b6340e8%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637007985413516945&sdata=UxEPS1%2B%2BgkZWuRgjN2EtlqhuP3wYIMJ76aqW38A88d0%3D&reserved=0>  

 

The deadline for comments is September 30,  2019. The results of this call will act as an input into the Global Digital Cooperation Main Session on day 1 at the IGF 2019 meeting.

 

I would be grateful if you could share the link with your respective constituencies. 

 

Best regards 

 

Chengetai 

_______________________________________________
ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org> 
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20190809/c95af06c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list