[ChineseGP] 答复: follow up to London meeting

[Wang Wei]

Sorry guys

 

“If some modification request is unignorable, a safer way would be
modifying CDNC table first.”

 

发件人: chinesegp-bounces at icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces at icann.org] 代
表 Wang Wei
发送时间: 2014年6月30日 21:37
收件人: ChineseGP at icann.org
主题: [ChineseGP] follow up to London meeting

 

Dear all

 

         In London meeting, Kenny and I joined the coordination meeting and
workshop, discussed with IP and representatives from K and J.

                  

         Here are some conclusions and tasks for the next step:

 

1)       Except for the coordination reason, the CGP Initial Character set
will keep EXACTLY the same with CDNC table, to eliminate the unnecessary
question of consistency and inconsistency from IP or other communities.

In other words, though there is no clear compulsory requirement for
consistency between TLD and SLD, different experts expressed different
opinions on the issue, the change to current SLD repertoire should be
carried out restrainedly and conservatively.

If some modification request is ignorable, a safer way would be modifying
CDNC table first.

         

2)       Adding expert from Malaysia and some other area.

 

3)       Kenny will ask Japan community and Korea community to confirm if
they agree or disagree with the coordination rules described in Asmus’s
slide (attached pdf 1) and ICANN document (attached pdf 2, appendix F)

Especially on the setting of “variant mapping” and “variant type”

 

CGP is fine with the proposed solution from ICANN, personally I hope it’s
OK with J and K too. 

But if J or K doesn’t accept that rule, we probably need a formal joint
statement for IP, then we need to propose a new feasible alternative for IP,
and of course, more negotiation with IP since they already published the
attached PDF2 and went through public comments.

 

4)       Our target is to finish the job before next ICANN meeting
(October), it is not changed. 

But it depends on the coordination rules for repertoire and variants.

Once the joint repertoire were made, I would be optimistic about instituting
generation rules in a short time.

Otherwise, if we can’t reach an agreement with J and K, we won’t move a
single step toward the generation rules.

 

 

Please voice your opinions as fully as possible~

 

Regards

Wang Wei

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/chinesegp/attachments/20140630/f3bb1336/attachment.html>