[ChineseGP] [Ques] 76 Chinese gTLD applications: 32 vs. 44

KIM Kyongsok gimgs0 at gmail.com
Wed Jul 2 08:23:47 UTC 2014


Dear everybody:

I am reading "CGP Proposal Draft 23 June 2014" and encountered the
following statement:

*CDNC put forwards its guiding rules for Chinese domain name registration:*

*-        The IDL and its Variant Labels SHOULD belong to the same
registrant.*

*-        The Simplified Chinese form and Traditional Chinese form of the
applied-for IDL SHOULD be resolvable simultaneously or non-resolvable at
all.[1]
<file:///A:/$00_0_0_ICANN50_LHR_20140622_27/CGP_proposal/CGP%20Proposal%20Draft%2023%20June%202014.docx#_ftn1>*

*In 2013, among 76 Chinese new gTLD applications, 32 applications abide by
the CDNC Character Set and guiding rules.*



1)  I would like to get more detailed information regarding 32 gTLD
applications which abided by the CDNC rules and 44 which did not;

2) Furthermore, out of 32 gTLDs, how many (and what) gTLDs were approved
and how many (and what) were not.

3) In addition, out of 44 gTLDs, how many (and what) gTLDs were approved
and how many (and what) were not.

  Thanks in advance.

Rgds,


KIM, K.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/chinesegp/attachments/20140702/0a788411/attachment.html>


More information about the ChineseGP mailing list