[ChineseGP] informal gathering in Dallas and the way forward

[HiroHOTTA]

Hi, CJK colleagues,

There's a proposal to meet (has a panel) in Macau in June.

However, I think it's definitely better for CJK to meet in late 
April or early May, which is well before Buenos Aires ICANN 
Meeting.  I proposed that to this mailing list, to propel our 
discussion.

I haven't heard from anyone from CGP/KGP about my proposal.

I know it's difficult for KGP to join the meeting, so it may be better
for CJK to meet in Korea.
May I have your opinion on this?

Hiro


On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:05:00 +0900
HiroHOTTA <hotta at jprs.co.jp> wrote:
> Dear CGP/JGP/KGP members,
> 
> Thank you for those of you who could make the informal gathering 
> on March 22 in Dallas happened. 
> 
> Let me report you about its results as one of the attendees of 
> the gathering.
> 
> <report from the gathering>
> 
> Three from CGP (including its Chair) and two from JGP (including 
> its Chair) made a sincere in-depth discussion on how to proceed 
> the script-wise LGR generation and the coordination among CJK. 
> Based on JGP's strawman proposal explained as a starter of the 
> gathering, they discussed about the framework, algorithm, and 
> their pros and cons. The proposed framework inherits the concept 
> of Dr. Zhang's definition that was sent to some members of 
> CGP/JGP/KGP including all three GP Chairs on March 10, 2015. The 
> attendees of the gathering there tentatively agreed JGP's 
> proposal with some small improvements. 
> 
> Following the gathering, the attendees agreed that 
> - CGP would continue working on its revised (reduced) LGR 
>   definition (outcome expected to come up in mid-April)
> - JGP would share its experimental draft LGR with CGP (in a 
>   couple of days) for CGP/JGP to ensure that the strawman 
>   proposal would work appropriately from technical perspective 
>   and from script community perspective.
> - JGP will work on the improvement of the proposal (in a week)
> 
> Of course, CGP and JGP are and will be ready to share their above 
> output among CGP/JGP/KGP after necessary amendment in due course.
> 
> <meeting proposal : expected to be agreed in some form>
> 
> Now seeing that the informal process in each GP is advancing, I'd 
> like to propose a CGP/JGP/KGP coordination meeting in late April 
> - before mid May at the latest.
> 
> May I have opinions on this CJK meeting proposal from CGP/JGP/KGP?  
> Especially about the feasibility, dates,  and venue.
> 
> Regards,
> Hiro Hotta, JGP Chair