[ChineseGP] informal gathering in Dallas and the way forward

[HiroHOTTA]

Dear all,

It seems difficult for us to move without specific 
proposal on the date/time and venue.
Let me narrow down the options regarding CJK meeting.

date/time
  1st option : 1.5 days during 28/April - 30/April
  2nd option : 1.5 days during 15/May - 17/May

venue
  Seoul

Either of the above options works for 3 JGP 
representatives.

I hope CGP and KGP can send representatives to either 
of the above options. 
Looking forward to your response.

Regards,
Hiro


On Fri, 3 Apr 2015 08:54:17 +0900
Dongman Lee <dlee at cs.kaist.ac.kr> wrote:
> Hiro,
> 
> First of all, I fully agree with you on having a meeting before the next ICANN meeting. Thanks for a kind and excellent suggestion of Seoul as a meeting location. I will check with KISA.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Dongman 
> 
> ?? iPhone?? ??
> 
> 2015. 4. 3. ?? 12:12 HiroHOTTA <hotta at jprs.co.jp> ??:
> 
> > Hi, CJK colleagues,
> > 
> > There's a proposal to meet (has a panel) in Macau in June.
> > 
> > However, I think it's definitely better for CJK to meet in late 
> > April or early May, which is well before Buenos Aires ICANN 
> > Meeting.  I proposed that to this mailing list, to propel our 
> > discussion.
> > 
> > I haven't heard from anyone from CGP/KGP about my proposal.
> > 
> > I know it's difficult for KGP to join the meeting, so it may be better
> > for CJK to meet in Korea.
> > May I have your opinion on this?
> > 
> > Hiro
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:05:00 +0900
> > HiroHOTTA <hotta at jprs.co.jp> wrote:
> >> Dear CGP/JGP/KGP members,
> >> 
> >> Thank you for those of you who could make the informal gathering 
> >> on March 22 in Dallas happened. 
> >> 
> >> Let me report you about its results as one of the attendees of 
> >> the gathering.
> >> 
> >> <report from the gathering>
> >> 
> >> Three from CGP (including its Chair) and two from JGP (including 
> >> its Chair) made a sincere in-depth discussion on how to proceed 
> >> the script-wise LGR generation and the coordination among CJK. 
> >> Based on JGP's strawman proposal explained as a starter of the 
> >> gathering, they discussed about the framework, algorithm, and 
> >> their pros and cons. The proposed framework inherits the concept 
> >> of Dr. Zhang's definition that was sent to some members of 
> >> CGP/JGP/KGP including all three GP Chairs on March 10, 2015. The 
> >> attendees of the gathering there tentatively agreed JGP's 
> >> proposal with some small improvements. 
> >> 
> >> Following the gathering, the attendees agreed that 
> >> - CGP would continue working on its revised (reduced) LGR 
> >>  definition (outcome expected to come up in mid-April)
> >> - JGP would share its experimental draft LGR with CGP (in a 
> >>  couple of days) for CGP/JGP to ensure that the strawman 
> >>  proposal would work appropriately from technical perspective 
> >>  and from script community perspective.
> >> - JGP will work on the improvement of the proposal (in a week)
> >> 
> >> Of course, CGP and JGP are and will be ready to share their above 
> >> output among CGP/JGP/KGP after necessary amendment in due course.
> >> 
> >> <meeting proposal : expected to be agreed in some form>
> >> 
> >> Now seeing that the informal process in each GP is advancing, I'd 
> >> like to propose a CGP/JGP/KGP coordination meeting in late April 
> >> - before mid May at the latest.
> >> 
> >> May I have opinions on this CJK meeting proposal from CGP/JGP/KGP?  
> >> Especially about the feasibility, dates,  and venue.
> >> 
> >> Regards,
> >> Hiro Hotta, JGP Chair
> > 
> > 
>