[ChineseGP] Characters likely to cause offence

Yoshiro YONEYA yoshiro.yoneya at jprs.co.jp
Tue May 12 01:55:11 UTC 2015


Dear Chris-san,

> I suspect there may be other characters in there that could cause offence, but 卐 5350 could be horribly abused. I 
> realize that the character it represents is used innocently in temples.

The reason why this character (U+5350) is in J-LGR-2 is that 
this is defined as variant of U+534D in C-LGR-1.  U+534D is in 
J-LGR-1 repertoire, so it was integrated into J-LGR-2 by proposed 
integration algorithm.

As you see in J-LGR-2.xlsx, U+5350 is marked as (o) or (b), so it 
will never appear on Root zone if it is used in applied-for string 
as Japanese IDN TLD.

Regards,

-- 
Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya at jprs.co.jp>

On Mon, 11 May 2015 14:02:14 +0000 "Dillon, Chris" <c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk> wrote:

> Dear Yoneya-san,
> 
> I mentioned in my last email that one of the things I found in J-LGR-2.xlsx was of a more serious nature.
> 
> I suspect there may be other characters in there that could cause offence, but 卐 5350 could be horribly abused. I 
> realize that the character it represents is used innocently in temples.
> 
> It is not our responsibility to make decisions about cases such as this and as far as I know, no part of the existing system deals 
> with them. However, having observed long discussion over cases such as .xxx and .sucks, alarm bells do go off and one 
> feels one should draw 5350 to the attention of colleagues.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Chris.
> --
> Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon 
> 
> 



More information about the ChineseGP mailing list