[ChineseGP] 答复: [klgp165_31] Possible errors in C-LGR-1 (2015.04.30.)?

[王伟]

Dear Prof. Kim

Sorry for the late response.

1) For the first question

I think our output is the same, the only difference is the EXCEL format.

4E05 丅 下(4E0B) 下(4E0B)>
-> 4E05 is missing

4E05 is not missing in the XML document, we just don't put it in variant column (the 3rd column) when it is the ORIGINAL char (the 1st column)


2) For the second question

yes, you are right. We made some mistake in the last version.
Anyway, China-mainland, Taiwan, Hongkong experts are still confirming what we should treat these IICore chars.
We might have a new result by the end of this month.

Regards


Wang Wei

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: KIM Kyongsok [mailto:gimgs0 at gmail.com] 
发送时间: 2015年9月17日 13:29
收件人: Wang Wei; chinesegp at icann.org
抄送: JapaneseGP at icann.org; koreanGP at icann.org
主题: [klgp165_31] Possible errors in C-LGR-1 (2015.04.30.)?

Dear Mr Wang and members:

Since the subject of my previous message was confusing (wrong?), I am sending the message again with subject corrected.

Sorry and thanks.

Rgds,

KIM, K.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0 at gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: 答复: [Japanesegp] 答复: [ChineseGP] K-LGR v0.3 (2015.08.13.)
To: 王伟 <wangwei at cnic.cn>
Cc: Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya at jprs.co.jp>, "chinesegp at icann.org"
<chinesegp at icann.org>, "JapaneseGP at icann.org" <JapaneseGP at icann.org>, "koreanGP at icann.org" <koreanGP at icann.org>


Dear Mr. Wang Wei:



On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:03 PM, 王伟 <wangwei at cnic.cn> wrote:
> Dear Yoneya San
>
> Yes, CGP will update it. We will share it around this weekend.

I will really appreciate if CGP would also review and, if needed, accommodate Korea's review when CGP update C-LGR.

Korea sent its review result on July 16 and the subject of the message was:

[klgp165_31] Possible errors in C-LGR-1 (2015.04.30.).

I am sending the review result once again in this e-mail.

Thanks  in advance.

Rgds,

KIM, K.

>
>
>
> Regards
> Wang Wei
>

from:KIM Kyongsok<gimgs0 at gmail.com>
to:Wang Wei <wangwei at cnic.cn>,
    Kenny Huang <huangksh at gmail.com>
date:Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:19 PM
subject:[klgp165_31] Possible errors in C-LGR-1 (2015.04.30.)?
Hi, everybody:

KLGP is reviewing C-LGR-1 (2015.04.30.) and found some possible errors.

1. 618 lines do NOT seem to obey reflexivity (see Appendix 1 for details).

2. In  two cases, in addition to reflexivity, there seem symmetry and transitivity issues (problems).

3. Am I missing something? I may be wrong.

I am looking forward to hearing from you.
Thanks in advance.

* BTW, this message was sent about 4 weeks ago to CGP cochairs.

Rgds,


--
김 경석      KIM, Kyongsok

--
김 경석      KIM, Kyongsok


-- 
김 경석      KIM, Kyongsok