[ChineseGP] 答复: [klgp165_31] Possible errors in C-LGR-1 (2015.04.30.)?

[KIM Kyongsok]

Dear Mr. Wang:

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 7:14 PM, 王伟 <wangwei at cnic.cn> wrote:
> Dear Prof. Kim
>
> Sorry for the late response.
>
> 1) For the first question
>
> I think our output is the same, the only difference is the EXCEL format.
>
> 4E05 丅 下(4E0B) 下(4E0B)>
> -> 4E05 is missing
>
> 4E05 is not missing in the XML document, we just don't put it in variant
> column (the 3rd column) when it is the ORIGINAL char (the 1st column)

I see.  Thanks.

I wonder if you can add them in variant column in the new version of C-LGR
so that data in  excel format is the same as data in xml format.

>
>
> 2) For the second question
>
> yes, you are right. We made some mistake in the last version.
> Anyway, China-mainland, Taiwan, Hongkong experts are still
> confirming what we should treat these IICore chars.
> We might have a new result by the end of this month.

Thanks very much.

Rgds,

KIM, K.

>
> Regards
>
>
> Wang Wei
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: KIM Kyongsok [mailto:gimgs0 at gmail.com]
> 发送时间: 2015年9月17日 13:29
> 收件人: Wang Wei; chinesegp at icann.org
> 抄送: JapaneseGP at icann.org; koreanGP at icann.org
> 主题: [klgp165_31] Possible errors in C-LGR-1 (2015.04.30.)?
>
> Dear Mr Wang and members:
>
> Since the subject of my previous message was confusing (wrong?), I am sending the message again with subject corrected.
>
> Sorry and thanks.
>
> Rgds,
>
> KIM, K.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0 at gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:26 PM
> Subject: Re: 答复: [Japanesegp] 答复: [ChineseGP] K-LGR v0.3 (2015.08.13.)
> To: 王伟 <wangwei at cnic.cn>
> Cc: Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya at jprs.co.jp>, "chinesegp at icann.org"
> <chinesegp at icann.org>, "JapaneseGP at icann.org" <JapaneseGP at icann.org>, "koreanGP at icann.org" <koreanGP at icann.org>
>
>
> Dear Mr. Wang Wei:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:03 PM, 王伟 <wangwei at cnic.cn> wrote:
>> Dear Yoneya San
>>
>> Yes, CGP will update it. We will share it around this weekend.
>
> I will really appreciate if CGP would also review and, if needed, accommodate Korea's review when CGP update C-LGR.
>
> Korea sent its review result on July 16 and the subject of the message was:
>
> [klgp165_31] Possible errors in C-LGR-1 (2015.04.30.).
>
> I am sending the review result once again in this e-mail.
>
> Thanks  in advance.
>
> Rgds,
>
> KIM, K.
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Wang Wei
>>
>
> from:KIM Kyongsok<gimgs0 at gmail.com>
> to:Wang Wei <wangwei at cnic.cn>,
>     Kenny Huang <huangksh at gmail.com>
> date:Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:19 PM
> subject:[klgp165_31] Possible errors in C-LGR-1 (2015.04.30.)?
> Hi, everybody:
>
> KLGP is reviewing C-LGR-1 (2015.04.30.) and found some possible errors.
>
> 1. 618 lines do NOT seem to obey reflexivity (see Appendix 1 for details).
>
> 2. In  two cases, in addition to reflexivity, there seem symmetry and transitivity issues (problems).
>
> 3. Am I missing something? I may be wrong.
>
> I am looking forward to hearing from you.
> Thanks in advance.
>
> * BTW, this message was sent about 4 weeks ago to CGP cochairs.
>
> Rgds,
>
>
> --
> 김 경석      KIM, Kyongsok
>
> --
> 김 경석      KIM, Kyongsok
>
>
> --
> 김 경석      KIM, Kyongsok
>
>



-- 
김 경석      KIM, Kyongsok