[ChineseGP] comments (3) RE: C-LGR (2016.07.18.), Q4 and Q5.
KIM Kyongsok
gimgs0 at gmail.com
Tue Jul 19 07:46:53 UTC 2016
Dear Mr. Wang Wei:
I am making progress ^-^ and noticed some more errors/changes.
================================================================
Q3 (My previous message RE: MSS --> CCC)
=================================================================
Q4. This seems minor too. I notices that CJK compatibility paren was used
instead of regular ASCII paren. There were 2 occurrences in one line.
I would like to suggest that
")" (CJK compatibility paren) --> ")" (ASCII paren).
[ 2 occurrences in one line]
83B5 莵 菟(83DF) 菟(83DF) 莵(83B5)菟(83DF)
-->
83B5 莵 菟(83DF) 菟(83DF) 莵(83B5)菟(83DF)
=================================================================
Q5: I compared variant groups in C-LGR (2015.04.30.) and vg in C-LGR
(2016.07.18.) and
noticed some two variant groups (vg) were removed and three new vg are added.
I would like to know whether these removals are mistakes or not and
whether additions are really intended.
1) [removal] existed in C-LGR (2015.04.30.); now missing in C-LGR (2016.07.18.)
1a)
< 2 2 (O 5CAB 岫) (O 5CC0 峀): vg
===>
> 5CAB 岫 岫(5CAB) 岫(5CAB) 岫(5CAB): indep. char.
> 5CC0 峀 峀(5CC0) 峀(5CC0) 峀(5CC0): indep. char.
1b)
< 3 2 (O 5999 妙) (X 7385 玅) (O 7AD7 竗): vg of size 3 (3 variants)
===>
> 5999 妙 妙(5999) 妙(5999) 妙(5999)玅(7385): vg of size 2
> 7385 玅 妙(5999) 玅(7385) 妙(5999)玅(7385): vg of size 2
> 7AD7 竗 竗(7AD7) 竗(7AD7) 竗(7AD7) : indep. char.
2) [addition] did NOT exist in C-LGR (2015.04.30.); now added to C-LGR
(2016.07.18.)
2a)
< 7200 爀 爀(7200) 爀(7200) : indep. char.
< 8D6B 赫 赫(8D6B) 赫(8D6B) : indep. char.
===>
> 2 2 (O 7200 爀) (O 8D6B 赫) : a new vg of size 2
2b)
< 757A 畺 畺(757A) 畺(757A) : indep. char.
< 7586 疆 疆(7586) 疆(7586) : indep. charf.
===>
> 2 2 (O 757A 畺) (O 7586 疆) : a new vg. of size 2
2C)
< 3960 㥠 㥠(3960) 㥠(3960) : indep. char.
< 8ADD 諝 谞(8C1E) 諝(8ADD) : a vg. of size 2
< 8ADD 諝 谞(8C1E) 諝(8ADD) : a vg. of size 2
===>
> 3 2 (O 3960 㥠) (O 8ADD 諝) (X 8C1E 谞) : a new vg of size 3
* * *
Thanks in advance.
KIM, K.
-------------------------------
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:04 AM, KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Mr. Wang Wei:
>
> I seem to have found some minor errors in your C-LGR (2016.07.18.)
>
> In 9 lines (24 occurrences), MSS need be changed to CCC.
> One sample line is shown below:
>
> 5MSS 峌 峌(5MSS) 峌(5MSS) 峌(5MSS)
> -->
> 5CCC 峌 峌(5CCC) 峌(5CCC) 峌(5CCC)
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> KIM, K.
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 7:01 PM, 王伟 <wangwei at cnic.cn> wrote:
>> Dear Prof. Kim
>>
>> I checked these chars and confirm that there are some coding error/editorial error in the EXCEL
>> I have re-edited them in the attached document.
>>
>> Also, I excluded the char of 58B5 which is not in MSR.
>>
>> So please refer the latest version as attached.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> WANG Wei
>>
>>
>> -----邮件原件-----
>> 发件人: chinesegp-bounces at icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces at icann.org] 代表 KIM Kyongsok
>> 发送时间: 2016年7月17日 22:26
>> 收件人: chinesegp at icann.org
>> 抄送: JapaneseGP at icann.org; koreanGP at icann.org; KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0 at gmail.com>
>> 主题: [ChineseGP] comments (1) RE: C-LGR (2016.06.12.)
>>
>> Dear Mr. Wang:
>>
>> I started analyzing your variant groups published on 2016.06.12.
>>
>> I seem to have found some errors and will appreciate if you would check two issues described below.
>>
>> ====================================================
>> Q1. The following six variant groups seem to have some errors:
>>
>> --- 1
>> cvg_0: (5378) 缷(7F37)
>> cvg_0:卸(5378) 缷(7F37)
>>
>> --- 2
>> cvg_0: (5AD4) 嬪(5B2A)
>> cvg_0:嫔(5AD4) 嬪(5B2A)
>>
>> --- 3
>> cvg_0:䑃(4443) 朦(6726) OOO (sorted)
>> cvg_0:朦(6726) 䑃(4443) XXX (NOT sorted, minor)
>>
>> --- 4
>> cvg_0:击(51FB) (6483) 擊(64CA)
>> cvg_0:击(51FB) 撃(6483) 擊(64CA)
>> cvg_0:击(51FB) 撃(6483) 擊(64CA)
>>
>> --- 5
>> cvg_0: (5378) 缷(7F37)
>> cvg_0:卸(5378) 缷(7F37)
>>
>> --- 6
>> cvg_0:沣(6CA3) (7043)
>> cvg_0:沣(6CA3) 灃(7043)
>>
>>
>> ======================================================
>> Q2. I wonder if the following information RE: 3103 variant groups is correct. I will appreciate if you would check it.
>>
>>> Among 19738 characters, 3103 of them have non-reflexive variant
>>> character(s), including 2214 with 1 variant, 545 with 2 variants,
>>> 200 with 3 variants, 89 with 4 variants, 36 with 5 variants,
>>> 14 with 6 variants, 4 with 7 variants, 1 with 8 variants.
>>
>> - Based on your info, there should be 3103 variant groups and 12075 independent char (i.e., char with NO variant).
>>
>> - However, my initial "rough" analysis of <column G, All Variant
>> Mappings> of Appendix C file seems quite different from your numbers
>> (i.e., 3103 var. groups and 12075 indep. chars):
>>
>> a) # indep. chars: 11684 (<-- your number is 12075), diff = 391
>> b) # var. groups: 3518 (<-- your number is 3103), diff = 415
>>
>> Plz correct me if I am wrong.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Rgds,
>>
>> --
>> 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok
>> _______________________________________________
>> ChineseGP mailing list
>> ChineseGP at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/chinesegp
>
>
>
> --
> 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok
--
김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok
More information about the ChineseGP
mailing list