<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:16 PM, HiroHOTTA <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hotta@jprs.co.jp" target="_blank">hotta@jprs.co.jp</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear all,<br>
<br>
It seems difficult for us to move without specific<br>
proposal on the date/time and venue.<br>
Let me narrow down the options regarding CJK meeting.<br>
<br>
date/time<br>
1st option : 1.5 days during 28/April - 30/April<br>
2nd option : 1.5 days during 15/May - 17/May<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>For me,</div><div><br></div><div>1st option is not good: I have a meeting and a class.</div><div>2nd option seems good although it includes a weekend.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks.</div><div><br></div><div>KIM, K.</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
venue<br>
Seoul<br>
<br>
Either of the above options works for 3 JGP<br>
representatives.<br>
<br>
I hope CGP and KGP can send representatives to either<br>
of the above options.<br>
Looking forward to your response.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Hiro<br>
<span class=""><br>
<br>
On Fri, 3 Apr 2015 08:54:17 +0900<br>
Dongman Lee <<a href="mailto:dlee@cs.kaist.ac.kr">dlee@cs.kaist.ac.kr</a>> wrote:<br>
</span><span class="">> Hiro,<br>
><br>
> First of all, I fully agree with you on having a meeting before the next ICANN meeting. Thanks for a kind and excellent suggestion of Seoul as a meeting location. I will check with KISA.<br>
><br>
> Regards,<br>
><br>
> Dongman<br>
><br>
</span>> ?? iPhone?? ??<br>
><br>
> 2015. 4. 3. ?? 12:12 HiroHOTTA <<a href="mailto:hotta@jprs.co.jp">hotta@jprs.co.jp</a>> ??:<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">><br>
> > Hi, CJK colleagues,<br>
> ><br>
> > There's a proposal to meet (has a panel) in Macau in June.<br>
> ><br>
> > However, I think it's definitely better for CJK to meet in late<br>
> > April or early May, which is well before Buenos Aires ICANN<br>
> > Meeting. I proposed that to this mailing list, to propel our<br>
> > discussion.<br>
> ><br>
> > I haven't heard from anyone from CGP/KGP about my proposal.<br>
> ><br>
> > I know it's difficult for KGP to join the meeting, so it may be better<br>
> > for CJK to meet in Korea.<br>
> > May I have your opinion on this?<br>
> ><br>
> > Hiro<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:05:00 +0900<br>
> > HiroHOTTA <<a href="mailto:hotta@jprs.co.jp">hotta@jprs.co.jp</a>> wrote:<br>
> >> Dear CGP/JGP/KGP members,<br>
> >><br>
> >> Thank you for those of you who could make the informal gathering<br>
> >> on March 22 in Dallas happened.<br>
> >><br>
> >> Let me report you about its results as one of the attendees of<br>
> >> the gathering.<br>
> >><br>
> >> <report from the gathering><br>
> >><br>
> >> Three from CGP (including its Chair) and two from JGP (including<br>
> >> its Chair) made a sincere in-depth discussion on how to proceed<br>
> >> the script-wise LGR generation and the coordination among CJK.<br>
> >> Based on JGP's strawman proposal explained as a starter of the<br>
> >> gathering, they discussed about the framework, algorithm, and<br>
> >> their pros and cons. The proposed framework inherits the concept<br>
> >> of Dr. Zhang's definition that was sent to some members of<br>
> >> CGP/JGP/KGP including all three GP Chairs on March 10, 2015. The<br>
> >> attendees of the gathering there tentatively agreed JGP's<br>
> >> proposal with some small improvements.<br>
> >><br>
> >> Following the gathering, the attendees agreed that<br>
> >> - CGP would continue working on its revised (reduced) LGR<br>
> >> definition (outcome expected to come up in mid-April)<br>
> >> - JGP would share its experimental draft LGR with CGP (in a<br>
> >> couple of days) for CGP/JGP to ensure that the strawman<br>
> >> proposal would work appropriately from technical perspective<br>
> >> and from script community perspective.<br>
> >> - JGP will work on the improvement of the proposal (in a week)<br>
> >><br>
> >> Of course, CGP and JGP are and will be ready to share their above<br>
> >> output among CGP/JGP/KGP after necessary amendment in due course.<br>
> >><br>
> >> <meeting proposal : expected to be agreed in some form><br>
> >><br>
> >> Now seeing that the informal process in each GP is advancing, I'd<br>
> >> like to propose a CGP/JGP/KGP coordination meeting in late April<br>
> >> - before mid May at the latest.<br>
> >><br>
> >> May I have opinions on this CJK meeting proposal from CGP/JGP/KGP?<br>
> >> Especially about the feasibility, dates, and venue.<br>
> >><br>
> >> Regards,<br>
> >> Hiro Hotta, JGP Chair<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok</div>
</div></div>