<P>Dear All</P>
<P>Has the date of Seoul meeing been fixed ?</P>
<P>As CGP and JGP discussed in Dallas, we have produced tow versoins of repertoire and variant table.<BR>We will send them out to JGP after the fortnight meeting at tomorrow afternoon. </P>
<P><BR><BR><BR>> -----原始邮件-----<BR>> 发件人: HiroHOTTA <hotta@jprs.co.jp><BR>> 发送时间: 2015年4月10日 星期五<BR>> 收件人: "Dongman Lee" <dlee@cs.kaist.ac.kr>, "KIM Kyongsok" <gimgs0@gmail.com>, "Joe Zhang" <joezhang43@hotmail.com>, "Wang Wei" <wangwei@cnnic.cn>, "Kenny Huang" <huangksh@gmail.com>, Yuri <takamatsu@jprs.co.jp>, "Yoshiro YONEYA" <yoshiro.yoneya@jprs.co.jp>, "Zhang Zhoucai" <joe.zhang@unihan.com.cn>, "<qichao@cnnic.cn>" <qichao@cnnic.cn>, "Zhiwei Yan" <yanzhiwei@cnnic.cn><BR>> 抄送: "KoreanGP@icann.org" <KoreanGP@icann.org>, "ChineseGP@icann.org" <ChineseGP@icann.org>, "JapaneseGP@icann.org" <JapaneseGP@icann.org><BR>> 主题: Re: [ChineseGP] informal gathering in Dallas and the way forward<BR>> <BR>> Dear professors,<BR>> <BR>> Thank you for your response.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Dear all,<BR>> <BR>> It's usually not easy (almost imporrisible) for all the <BR>> important people to gather together.<BR>> <BR>> It seems the below are the possible options where at <BR>> least one important person from KGP can join.<BR>> <BR>> Option-a 1 day on 29/April Prof. Lee OK<BR>> Option-b 1.5 days during 15/May-17/May Prof. Kim OK<BR>> <BR>> After hearing from CGP, let's see how we can arrange the <BR>> dates.<BR>> <BR>> Regards,<BR>> Hiro<BR>> <BR>> On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:09:20 +0900<BR>> Dongman Lee <dlee@cs.kaist.ac.kr> wrote:<BR>> > Hmm.. I'm sorry to say that I'll be in the USA for a business trip. So the 1st option only works for me. April 29th works best for me.<BR>> > <BR>> > Regards,<BR>> > <BR>> > Dongman<BR>> > <BR>> > 2015-04-10 ?? 12:25? KIM Kyongsok ?(?) ? ?:<BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:16 PM, HiroHOTTA <hotta@jprs.co.jp > <mailto:hotta@jprs.co.jp>> wrote:<BR>> > ><BR>> > > Dear all,<BR>> > ><BR>> > > It seems difficult for us to move without specific<BR>> > > proposal on the date/time and venue.<BR>> > > Let me narrow down the options regarding CJK meeting.<BR>> > ><BR>> > > date/time<BR>> > > 1st option : 1.5 days during 28/April - 30/April<BR>> > > 2nd option : 1.5 days during 15/May - 17/May<BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>> > > For me,<BR>> > ><BR>> > > 1st option is not good: I have a meeting and a class.<BR>> > > 2nd option seems good although it includes a weekend.<BR>> > ><BR>> > > Thanks.<BR>> > ><BR>> > > KIM, K.<BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>> > > venue<BR>> > > Seoul<BR>> > ><BR>> > > Either of the above options works for 3 JGP<BR>> > > representatives.<BR>> > ><BR>> > > I hope CGP and KGP can send representatives to either<BR>> > > of the above options.<BR>> > > Looking forward to your response.<BR>> > ><BR>> > > Regards,<BR>> > > Hiro<BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>> > > On Fri, 3 Apr 2015 08:54:17 +0900<BR>> > > Dongman Lee <dlee@cs.kaist.ac.kr <mailto:dlee@cs.kaist.ac.kr>> wrote:<BR>> > > > Hiro,<BR>> > > ><BR>> > > > First of all, I fully agree with you on having a meeting before<BR>> > > the next ICANN meeting. Thanks for a kind and excellent suggestion<BR>> > > of Seoul as a meeting location. I will check with KISA.<BR>> > > ><BR>> > > > Regards,<BR>> > > ><BR>> > > > Dongman<BR>> > > ><BR>> > > > ?? iPhone?? ??<BR>> > > ><BR>> > > > 2015. 4. 3. ?? 12:12 HiroHOTTA <hotta@jprs.co.jp<BR>> > > <mailto:hotta@jprs.co.jp>> ??:<BR>> > > ><BR>> > > > > Hi, CJK colleagues,<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > There's a proposal to meet (has a panel) in Macau in June.<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > However, I think it's definitely better for CJK to meet in late<BR>> > > > > April or early May, which is well before Buenos Aires ICANN<BR>> > > > > Meeting. I proposed that to this mailing list, to propel our<BR>> > > > > discussion.<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > I haven't heard from anyone from CGP/KGP about my proposal.<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > I know it's difficult for KGP to join the meeting, so it may<BR>> > > be better<BR>> > > > > for CJK to meet in Korea.<BR>> > > > > May I have your opinion on this?<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > Hiro<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:05:00 +0900<BR>> > > > > HiroHOTTA <hotta@jprs.co.jp <mailto:hotta@jprs.co.jp>> wrote:<BR>> > > > >> Dear CGP/JGP/KGP members,<BR>> > > > >><BR>> > > > >> Thank you for those of you who could make the informal gathering<BR>> > > > >> on March 22 in Dallas happened.<BR>> > > > >><BR>> > > > >> Let me report you about its results as one of the attendees of<BR>> > > > >> the gathering.<BR>> > > > >><BR>> > > > >> <report from the gathering><BR>> > > > >><BR>> > > > >> Three from CGP (including its Chair) and two from JGP (including<BR>> > > > >> its Chair) made a sincere in-depth discussion on how to proceed<BR>> > > > >> the script-wise LGR generation and the coordination among CJK.<BR>> > > > >> Based on JGP's strawman proposal explained as a starter of the<BR>> > > > >> gathering, they discussed about the framework, algorithm, and<BR>> > > > >> their pros and cons. The proposed framework inherits the concept<BR>> > > > >> of Dr. Zhang's definition that was sent to some members of<BR>> > > > >> CGP/JGP/KGP including all three GP Chairs on March 10, 2015. The<BR>> > > > >> attendees of the gathering there tentatively agreed JGP's<BR>> > > > >> proposal with some small improvements.<BR>> > > > >><BR>> > > > >> Following the gathering, the attendees agreed that<BR>> > > > >> - CGP would continue working on its revised (reduced) LGR<BR>> > > > >> definition (outcome expected to come up in mid-April)<BR>> > > > >> - JGP would share its experimental draft LGR with CGP (in a<BR>> > > > >> couple of days) for CGP/JGP to ensure that the strawman<BR>> > > > >> proposal would work appropriately from technical perspective<BR>> > > > >> and from script community perspective.<BR>> > > > >> - JGP will work on the improvement of the proposal (in a week)<BR>> > > > >><BR>> > > > >> Of course, CGP and JGP are and will be ready to share their above<BR>> > > > >> output among CGP/JGP/KGP after necessary amendment in due course.<BR>> > > > >><BR>> > > > >> <meeting proposal : expected to be agreed in some form><BR>> > > > >><BR>> > > > >> Now seeing that the informal process in each GP is advancing, I'd<BR>> > > > >> like to propose a CGP/JGP/KGP coordination meeting in late April<BR>> > > > >> - before mid May at the latest.<BR>> > > > >><BR>> > > > >> May I have opinions on this CJK meeting proposal from<BR>> > > CGP/JGP/KGP?<BR>> > > > >> Especially about the feasibility, dates, and venue.<BR>> > > > >><BR>> > > > >> Regards,<BR>> > > > >> Hiro Hotta, JGP Chair<BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > > ><BR>> > > ><BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>> > > -- > ? ?? KIM, Kyongsok<BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > -- Dongman Lee, PhD<BR>> > Head, Graduate School of Culture Technology<BR>> > Professor, Department of Computer Science<BR>> > KAIST<BR>> > 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu<BR>> > Daejon 305-701<BR>> > KOREA<BR>> > <BR>> > E-mail: dlee@kaist.ac.kr<BR>> > Web: http://cds.kaist.ac.kr/cdsn/DongmanLee<BR>> > Tel: +82-42-350-2901/3559<BR>> > HP: +82-10-3412-1387<BR>> > <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> ChineseGP mailing list<BR>> ChineseGP@icann.org<BR>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/chinesegp<BR></P><br><br><br>