From secura at domainregistry.de Mon May 18 07:30:15 2020 From: secura at domainregistry.de (ICANN Registrar Secura) Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 09:30:15 +0200 Subject: [Comments-ccnso-pdp3-retire-cctlds-05may20] Enough Time Message-ID: <6D96C27520A74F00853ABDBFED76B14C@DESKTOPD90N8CH> The report says,the ccTLD shall be removed from the Root Zone 5 years (?Default Retirement Date?) from the date of this notice. Five years are enough time for registrants and registrars to prepare for the situation. I assume, that in many cases the retired cc TLD is replace by a new cc TLD. We propose, that the grandfathering rule is applied and the owners of a name at the old cc TLD have the right to register their names prior to others. Mit freundlichen Gr??en/ with kind regards, Hans-Peter Oswald Gesch?ftsf?hrer ----------------------------------------- SECURA GMBH Frohnhofweg 18 Tel +49(0)221 257 12 13 D-50858 K?ln Fax +49(0)221 925 22 72 www.domainregistry.de secura at domainregistry.de Tel (US/CA toll-free): +1 866 655 3680 ------------------------------------------------------- Gesch?ftsf?hrer/CEO Amtsgericht K?ln HRB 31240 Hans-Peter Oswald Ust.-IdNr/VATID DE196859556 ------------------------------------------------------- +++ ICANN ACCREDITED REGISTRAR OF TOP-LEVEL-DOMAINS +++ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Clement at Genty.info Thu May 21 11:48:57 2020 From: Clement at Genty.info (Dr Clement Genty) Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 13:48:57 +0200 Subject: [Comments-ccnso-pdp3-retire-cctlds-05may20] ccNSO PDP3: Initial Proposals for Process to Retire ccTLDs Message-ID: <1c3b6baeae676bfd4d4201c8c41cc7bf@Genty.info> Hi, The ccTLDs have been modelled on the ISO 3166-1 alpha 2 standard to avoid, as Postel said, IANA having to choose what a country is or is not. ISO is based on purely technical considerations. ICANN is a technical organization but includes public participation for public input, which I do. This humanism on the part of ICANN must remain a constant and ICANN must not act in a dichotomous way. The example of the .SU, which is still working is a good example of this. Tuvalu, .TV, ccTLD that has become a gccTLD according to Google, is a territory that risks disappearing in case of global warming. So according to the ISO, the TV code will no longer exist. But should we delete a code of a country and therefore its past, its history? A few years ago, I had contacted the ISO to activate the JU code for Julia Island, a French island located at the south of Sicily. I didn't get a positive answer as the island Julia was swallowed up by the waters. But wasn't there a past on this island? It seems important to me that ICANN goes beyond purely technical considerations and that it keeps any ccTLD that has already existed. Otherwise its role would be purely technical and nothing would prevent it from being included in the ITU. Regards, Clement -- Dr Clement Genty Meursault (C?te d'Or) - France www.genty.info