<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#003300">I do not support the amendment as written. I have a software engineer building web services for over a decade.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#003300"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#003300">I believe that raising prices on .com TLDs is necessary, but the amendment allows raising prices too quickly, and should provide better caps on pricing adjustments. <br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#003300"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#003300">Furthermore I do <b>not</b> support Verisign receiving any more power over .com domains, nor its ability to  gain even more control prices for .com domains.<br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#003300"><br clear="all"></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,51,0)" class="gmail_default">Sincerely,</div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,51,0)" class="gmail_default">Jeff Parrish</div><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><font color="#999999">Phone: +1-916-801-6693</font></div></div></div></div></div>