[council] RrC Entries on the Priorities spreadsheet

[Tim Ruiz]

I don't know. We didn't really try to figure that out. Perhaps NA (Not
applicable) would be a better representation for feasibility, given our
position.

Tim 


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [council] RrC Entries on the Priorities spreadsheet
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com>
Date: Tue, December 16, 2008 11:40 am
To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim at godaddy.com>, "Council GNSO"
<council at gnso.icann.org>


Thanks Tim. One question: what does zero (0) feasibility mean?

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org 
> [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 11:44 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: [council] RrC Entries on the Priorities spreadsheet
> 
> Attached. I also uploaded it to the Wiki site, but not sure 
> if that was useful or not.
> 
> Tim 
> 
>