[council] Response to ccNSO/GAC Issues report

[Gomes, Chuck]

That would be inconsistent with the recommendations made for new gTLDs.
We can't go back now and change what we already did.
 
Chuck

________________________________

From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org]
On Behalf Of Robin Gross
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 5:53 AM
To: Avri Doria
Cc: Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] Response to ccNSO/GAC Issues report


How about:
    "Strings that cause technical confusion should be avoided."

Thanks,
Robin


On Feb 12, 2008, at 1:43 AM, Avri Doria wrote:




	On 12 Feb 2008, at 14:29, Robin Gross wrote:



		**** THEREFORE, I propose that we amend our statement,
so that only "technical confusion" is the type of confusion that we deal
with.   Otherwise, not only are we in contrast with legal norms, we are
also outside the scope of ICANN's authority.



	Can you suggest the exact wording change you are proposing?

	As with other suggested changes, I believe we can make if there
are no objections.
	On the other hand, if there are objections, we may need to vote
on this amendment before voting on the response itself.

	thanks

	a.






IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin at ipjustice.org



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20080212/89934407/attachment.html>