[council] Feedback on Open Joint Sessions in Cairo
Avri Doria
avri at acm.org
Wed Nov 12 00:57:32 UTC 2008
Hi,
The Thursday GNSO meeting came up with some concrete proposals that I
passed on to the other chairs.
In essence the GNSO suggestions have been accepted:
Format for first meeting
- a round table format with constituency and region representatives
(each of the ACSOs figures out its own mix). How this is done remains
to be discussed.
- 3 important bullets on the topic(s) from each of the ACSOs published
before the meeting
- Ranking of the priority of the topic(s) within the ACSO is also
published
Same sort of schedule
- first meeting at the beginning of the week to share opinions
- second meeting at the end to share feedback (this one might still
invovle chairs) we did nt discuss it.
Topic has not been set yet. Various sub-themes from 'fees' was used
as an example during the meeting.
So we essentially did as you recommended already, although if there is
more to say, or if I missed the point, we can certainly go further.
In that case I wold recommend a drafting team approach, with those who
want to flesh the idea out further producing a proposal for the
Council to consider.
a.
On 11 Nov 2008, at 18:10, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> I wonder if we should take the initiate to develop a proposal for an
> improved format for Mexico City?
>
> Chuck
>
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org
> ] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 10:32 AM
> To: council at gnso.icann.org
> Subject: [council] Feedback on Open Joint Sessions in Cairo
>
> I wanted to provide some feedback on the open joint sessions.
>
> Positive points
> - it happened
> - it addressed genuine cross SO/AC issues
>
> Negative points
> - many issues were ill suited to a single SO/AC view and so the
> chair was unable to provide input
> - the event was a bit lack lustre because of this overly strong
> focus on the chairs
> - I did not agree with the populist proposal to have every SO under
> the sun here just because they exist. The event was intended to
> foster understanding on joint issues not be a platform for every SO/
> AC.
>
> Proposal
> Imagine a large empty room with one large round table with the full
> leadership of each organisation sitting ie the GNSO Council, CC
> council, the ALAC, the GAC leadership etc. It would be a big table -
> maybe three tiered in the style of UN security council with one
> lead. But it would be exciting if THIS group had answered the
> questions. Observers would sit around the group in outer circles,
> interacting as usual.
>
>
> Philip
>
>
>
>
> PS Glen would you be so kind as to forward this to Patrick Sharry
> also ?
More information about the council
mailing list