[council] Re; Impovements plan - a comment on the compositon of the OSC
Avri Doria
avri at acm.org
Fri Oct 10 14:40:13 UTC 2008
Hi,
On 10 Oct 2008, at 10:27, Rosette, Kristina wrote:
> Given that we're talking about a "full consensus" decision-making
> threshold, what's the mechanism for rectifying a situation in which
> full
> consensus is not reached solely because of CIF views, but the CIF
> never
> actually becomes a constituency? In other words, what is the plan for
> handling issues on which, but for the CIF, full consensus would have
> been reached?
as observers, i do not believe they are part of consensus formation
other then as participants in the debate. I believe the plan calls for
full consensus of the members and is specific in differentiating
between members and other participants. If this is not clear, which i
think it is, then perhaps we need another amendment.
>
>
> Also, will members of the PPSC and OSC be permitted to designate
> alternates (1 per member) who can participate in the meetings in the
> event of an unavoidable scheduling conflict?
wouldn't that be up to the committee itself in terms of determining
their methods?
a.
More information about the council
mailing list