FW: [council] FW: Draft Motions on Vertical Integration

[Gomes, Chuck]

Mike,
 
First of all, it seems to me that the following 'whereas' clause is a
resolution and covered in that part of the motion, so I think it could
be deleted:  "Whereas, notwithstanding the recommendations in the Issues
Report, the GNSO Council has decided to initiate a PDP on vertical
integration between registries and registrars; and"
 
Debbie - As the seconder of the motion, do you consider it a friendly
amendment?
 
Do any Councilors need more time to vet this amendment with their SGs
and/or Constituencies?
 
Chuck
 
 


________________________________

	From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
	Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 5:32 AM
	To: GNSO Council
	Subject: FW: FW: [council] FW: Draft Motions on Vertical
Integration
	
	

	All,

	 

	Attached please find a somewhat redrafted motion in support of a
PDP, which I accept in its entirety as a friendly amendment to my
pending motion. 

	 

	Thanks,

	Mike

	 

	Mike Rodenbaugh

	RODENBAUGH LAW

	tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087

	http://rodenbaugh.com <http://rodenbaugh.com/> 

	 

	 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20100128/a137f2e4/attachment.html>