[council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs Competition
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Wed Nov 10 22:57:31 UTC 2010
I was sure that the Bylaws said that also, but all I can find is in
Section 2: "Except as otherwise defined in these Bylaws, the four
Stakeholder Groups and the Constituencies will be responsible for
defining their own charters with the approval of their members and of
the ICANN Board of Directors."
The RrSG does say "2.1. Eligibility - Only ICANN Accredited
Registrars are eligible for membership in the Registrar Stakeholder
Group ("Members"). In keeping with the selective membership criteria
of other GNSO constituencies, the Registrar Stakeholder Group
represents the interests of a specific sector, specifically those of
ICANN Accredited Registrars. Therefore to avoid conflicts of
interest, this typically excludes entities whose primary relationship
with ICANN is as a TLD Registry Operator." but it is not clear how
one would determine "primary relationship" in the future.
I can find no such prohibition in the RySG charter.
Regardless, if we stick with the current organization (and I am not
sure anyone has the stomach to change again now), it will be interesting.
Alan
At 10/11/2010 04:47 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>I believe the revised Bylaws GNSO provisions require that someone
>may not vote in more than one SG or Constituency.
>
>Chuck
>
>From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
>[mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
>Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 12:42 PM
>To: Adrian Kinderis; Council GNSO
>Subject: Re: (SCL > 6): [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New
>gTLDs Competition
>
>The old Bylaws said that an organization could be a member of more
>than one Constituency. I would have sworn that the new Bylaws
>explicitly said that you could not participate in multiple SG and
>had to choose, but I cannot find that clause there. Is there a rule
>in either SG charter about multiple memberships??
>
>Alan
>
>At 10/11/2010 02:18 AM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:
>
>Wow!
>
><http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-09nov10-en.htm>http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-09nov10-en.htm
>
>So what happens to the Contracted Party house? Did they think of that? ;)
>
>
>Adrian Kinderis
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20101110/09558b52/attachment.html>
More information about the council
mailing list