[council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs Competition
Adrian Kinderis
adrian at ausregistry.com.au
Thu Nov 11 04:33:16 UTC 2010
Nope. I'll just try and wait for someone to stop me.
Adrian Kinderis
From: alan.greenberg at sympatico.ca [mailto:alan.greenberg at sympatico.ca] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 2:15 PM
To: Adrian Kinderis; Gomes, Chuck; Council GNSO
Subject: RE: [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs Competition
Can you point to where the Bylaws (or anything else) say that? Alan
At 10/11/2010 08:53 PM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:
Right.
So you can be a member of each. Just not a voting member.
Adrian Kinderis
From: Gomes, Chuck [ mailto:cgomes at verisign.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 8:47 AM
To: Alan Greenberg; Adrian Kinderis; Council GNSO
Subject: RE: (SCL > 6): [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs Competition
I believe the revised Bylaws GNSO provisions require that someone may not vote in more than one SG or Constituency.
Chuck
From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [ mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 12:42 PM
To: Adrian Kinderis; Council GNSO
Subject: Re: (SCL > 6): [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs Competition
The old Bylaws said that an organization could be a member of more than one Constituency. I would have sworn that the new Bylaws explicitly said that you could not participate in multiple SG and had to choose, but I cannot find that clause there. Is there a rule in either SG charter about multiple memberships??
Alan
At 10/11/2010 02:18 AM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:
Wow!
http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-09nov10-en.htm
So what happens to the Contracted Party house? Did they think of that? ;)
Adrian Kinderis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20101111/8ce3eeee/attachment.html>
More information about the council
mailing list