[council] RE: Motion re. VI WG

[Gomes, Chuck]

I  am accepting one of Adrian's suggested amendments to this motion as
friendly and change it as highlighted in the attached file.  Other
suggested amendments are welcome.  Note also that a second is needed.

Chuck <<Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10 revised 30 Sep 10.doc>> 

		_____________________________________________
		From: Gomes, Chuck 
		Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 1:53 PM
		To: Council GNSO
		Subject: Motion re. VI WG 
		

		 << File: Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10.doc >> 
		In response to the Board retreat resolution regarding VI
and in order to meet the 8-day advance requirement for motions, I am
submitting this motion and would appreciate a second.  Please forward
this to your SGs and constituencies to determine support for the motion
on 7 October.

		I am not opposed to other ways of accomplishing this,
but thought that a motion is a clear way to kick it off.

		Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20100930/bf1a89f4/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10 revised 30 Sep 10.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 33792 bytes
Desc: Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10 revised 30 Sep 10.doc
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20100930/bf1a89f4/Motion-VIBoardResponse29Sep10revised30Sep10.doc>