AW: [council] Adrian's gameplan

[William Drake]

This version is fine, thanks Mary

Bill

On Jun 18, 2011, at 5:25 PM, <Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu> <Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu> wrote:

> I don't have a problem with that, Wolf-Ulrich i.e. your insertion and deleting the reference to "on behalf of our Cs and SGs".
>  
> If I may, we can also consider deleting the last part of my draft, which means the statement will now read (with Wolf-Ulrich's suggested changes included):
>  
> "The GNSO Council wishes to reiterate its support for the work of the Joint Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG). We unanimously believe that it is important for the new gTLD program to be globally inclusive, and to have as part of the implementation plan meaningful and workable mechanisms which will assist potential needy applicants, inter alia from developing regions of the world, participate in the first round of the new gTLD program as fully as possible. We reiterate also our thanks to the members of the JAS WG for all their hard work in preparing the two Milestone Reports, and look forward to receiving its Final Report."
> 
> 
>  
>  
> Mary W S Wong
> Professor of Law
> Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
> UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
> Two White Street
> Concord, NH 03301
> USA
> Email: mary.wong at law.unh.edu
> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
> Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
> >>>
> From:	<KnobenW at telekom.de>
> To:	<Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu>, <owner-council at gnso.icann.org>
> CC:	<council at gnso.icann.org>
> Date:	6/18/2011 5:20 AM
> Subject:	AW: [council] Adrian's gameplan
> 1. See my insertion. I think "needy applicants" is to be seen in a wider range - as referenced in the JAS report, too.
>  
> 2. The term "and on behalf of all our Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups" means (time-eating) co-ordination
>  
> Kind regards
> Wolf-Ulrich
>  
> 
> Von: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu
> Gesendet: Samstag, 18. Juni 2011 10:58
> An: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
> Cc: 'GNSO Council List'
> Betreff: RE: [council] Adrian's gameplan
> 
> How about -
>  
> "The GNSO Council wishes to reiterate its support for the work of the Joint Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG). We unanimously, and on behalf of all our Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups, believe that it is important for the new gTLD program to be globally inclusive, and to have as part of the implementation plan meaningful and workable mechanisms which will assist potential needy applicants [WUK: ]  - inter alia from developing regions of the world[WUK: ]  -  participate in the first round of the new gTLD program as fully as possible. We reiterate also our thanks to the members of the JAS WG for all their hard work in preparing the two Milestone Reports, and look forward to receiving its Final Report so that recommendations for ensuring equal access to the new gTLD program can be discussed and implemented."  
>  
> I would suggest that, if we can, a statement such as this (tweaked as necessary) be issued to the community (including the Board and the GAC) as soon as possible :)
>  
> Cheers
> Mary
> 
>  
> Mary W S Wong
> Professor of Law
> Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
> UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
> Two White Street
> Concord, NH 03301
> USA
> Email: mary.wong at law.unh.edu
> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
> Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
> >>>
> From:	Rosemary Sinclair <rosemary.sinclair at unsw.edu.au>
> To:	Adrian Kinderis <adrian at ausregistry.com.au>, "tim at godaddy.com" <tim at godaddy.com>, Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder at indom.com>, "owner-council at gnso.icann.org" <owner-council at gnso.icann.org>, "Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu" <Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu>
> CC:	"'GNSO Council List'" <council at gnso.icann.org>
> Date:	6/18/2011 4:48 AM
> Subject:	RE: [council] Adrian's gameplan
> Or that using a CWG when we do not have clear, agreed processes made progress on an issue where there was common commitment to doing "something" much more difficult for the WG members and the Council
> 
> Given that we now have a unanimous position supporting the group's work I think Mary's original proposal was very useful as it took the content out of play and left our ongoing discussion to focus on process management issues....in this case implementation proposals rather than policy proposals....
> 
> I'd support Mary's original version
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Rosemary
> ________________________________________
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Kinderis [adrian at ausregistry.com.au]
> Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 5:48 PM
> To: tim at godaddy.com; Stéphane Van Gelder; owner-council at gnso.icann.org; Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu
> Cc: 'GNSO Council List'
> Subject: RE: [council] Adrian's gameplan
> 
> +1
> 
> Adrian Kinderis
> 
> 
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of tim at godaddy.com
> Sent: Saturday, 18 June 2011 3:48 PM
> To: Stéphane Van Gelder; owner-council at gnso.icann.org; Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu
> Cc: 'GNSO Council List'
> Subject: Re: [council] Adrian's gameplan
> 
> And that a cwg or jwg may not have been the appropriate mechanism for the issue.
> 
> Tim
> ________________________________
> From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder at indom.com>
> Sender: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 09:09:47 +0200
> To: <Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu>
> Cc: 'GNSO Council List'<council at gnso.icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [council] Adrian's gameplan
> 
> Thanks Mary,
> 
> Would you be up for drafting a proposed statement, for the Council's consideration?
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> 
> 
> Le 18 juin 2011 à 09:01, <Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu<mailto:Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu>> a écrit :
> 
> 
> In partial follow-up to Adrian's point about possible deliverables and courses of action, I'd offer the suggestion I made during today's discussion, viz., that the GNSO Council consider circulating a brief statement to the ICANN community, stating its support for the work being done by the JAS WG and reiterating the importance of the issues they are considering.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Mary W S Wong
> Professor of Law
> Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
> UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
> Two White Street
> Concord, NH 03301
> USA
> Email: mary.wong at law.unh.edu<mailto:mary.wong at law.unh.edu>
> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
> Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
> >>>
> From:
> 
> "Andrei Kolesnikov" <andrei at cctld.ru<mailto:andrei at cctld.ru>>
> 
> To:
> 
> "'Adrian Kinderis'" <adrian at ausregistry.com.au<mailto:adrian at ausregistry.com.au>>, "'GNSO Council List'" <council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>
> 
> Date:
> 
> 6/18/2011 1:13 AM
> 
> Subject:
> 
> RE: [council] Adrian's gameplan
> 
> I think adding "set and bind to the timelines" would be beneficial.  Or there will be always a workaround for "endless discussion".
> 
> --andrei
> 
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org> [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Kinderis
> Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 12:56 PM
> To: GNSO Council List
> Subject: [council] Adrian's gameplan
> 
> As I discussed in the Working Session today.
> 
> The four issues based on this discussion (as I see them);
> 
> -          Stephane speaking directly to the Board
> -          Katim’s email and the issues of the JAS WG
> o   Processes within the Council
> -          The future of Cross Community Working Groups
> o   Publishing of reports etc
> -          The optics of the GNSO Council and the promotion of its internal processes and representation
> o   Multi stakeholder make up
> o   Differing views/ differing
> 
> It would be best, I think, to try and get some deliverables and courses of action in order to promote resolution.
> 
> Adrian Kinderis
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20110619/6adff8cc/attachment.html>