[council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
Tim Ruiz
tim at godaddy.com
Sun Mar 13 18:47:27 UTC 2011
Agree. Unfortunately, I may not be able to attend this lunch meeting,
but this is the first topic that would make me truly regret it.
Tim
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO
> Council meeting tomorrow
> From: "Andrei Kolesnikov" <andrei at cctld.ru>
> Date: Sun, March 13, 2011 1:38 pm
> To: "'Stéphane Van Gelder'" <stephane.vangelder at indom.com>,
> <council at gnso.icann.org>
>
> Yet another topic that might be interesting for discussion: should we exchange ideas regarding NTIA notice of inquiry on the IANA functions? Retirement of the tlds?
>
> --andrei
>
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stephane Van Gelder
> Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 7:28 AM
> To: council at gnso.icann.org GNSO
> Subject: [council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
> As it was necessary to provide the ccNSO with information on the topics we suggest we might discuss in advance, I have sent the following email to Chris Disspain.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Stéphane
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Début du message réexpédié :
>
>
>
>
> De : Stéphane Van Gelder
>
> Date : 13 mars 2011 05:26:15 HNEC
>
> À : Chris Disspain
>
> Objet : suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
>
>
> Chris,
>
>
> The GNSO Council has put together the following list of questions for our joint meeting tomorrow.
>
>
>
> We look forward to meeting with the ccNSO.
>
>
>
> Stéphane
>
>
>
>
>
> - A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work.
>
> - What are the ccNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct GNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)?
>
> - Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value?
>
> - There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the ccNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs?
>
> - Is it likely the move from cc to more general purpose (eg. .CO, .ME, .TV) will accelerate?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20110313/77868b2c/attachment.html>
More information about the council
mailing list