[council] Draft PDP charter - Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation PDP WG

Mary Wong mary.wong at icann.org
Thu Oct 17 19:17:17 UTC 2013 

Dear all, attached is a revised version of the draft charter, to which I've
added Volker's suggested questions (below) to the scope of the WG's work and
fixed the previous typos. I hope this revised version will be of assistance
in your continuing discussions.

Cheers
Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
Email: mary.wong at icann.org

* One World. One Internet. *

From:  Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>
Organization:  Afilias
Reply-To:  "jrobinson at afilias.info" <jrobinson at afilias.info>
Date:  Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:07 AM
To:  'Volker Greimann' <vgreimann at key-Systems.net>, "council at gnso.icann.org"
<council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject:  RE: [council] Draft PDP charter - Privacy & Proxy Accreditation
Services PDP WG

> Thanks Volker,
>  
> Agreed on the title.  I think the Privacy & Proxy Accreditation Services PDP
> WG is a typo/error and it should read Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation
> PDP WG.
> Thanks also for the specific additional input of your two points italicised
> below.
>  
> I¹d very much like to get additional input on whether or not we (or with the
> help of input from our respective groups / constituencies) can get the current
> draft charter polished to a satisfactory state.
>  
> There is obviously a driver to getting the WG going without the DT step  i.e.
> to demonstrate that the PDP process can be efficient and, to some extent,
> flexible whilst still being thorough.
> But, clearly we need to be sure that we are confident that we can tolerate
> skipping this (DT) step if we go down that route.
>  
> Jonathan
>  
> 
> From: Volker Greimann [mailto:vgreimann at key-systems.net]
> Sent: 15 October 2013 18:15
> To: jrobinson at afilias.info; council at gnso.icann.org
> Subject: Re: [council] Draft PDP charter - Privacy & Proxy Accreditation
> Services PDP WG
>  
> 
> Hi Jonathan, 
> 
> first of all, I support the new naming of the proposed PDP to better fit and
> describe the only identified remaining issues. By giving the PDP WG a name
> that says what is does, it will be easier to attract the necessary parties to
> participate in this important effort and add focus the work effort. Maybe just
> one suggestion would be to switch the positions of the words "Accreditation"
> and "Services" to make it read: "Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation PDP
> WG", i.e. the way it is spelled out in text of the draft charter, but not in
> the headline.
> 
> Regarding the charter, I feel that the draft is already a good template for
> the WG. While it may be advisable to give it a final polish in a Drafting
> Team, I can see why there is support for option one. I would however suggest a
> few further issues to consider:
> 
> "What are the effects of the privacy & proxy service specification contained
> in the 2013 RAA? Have these new requirements improved Whois quality,
> registrant contactability and service usability?"
> 
> "What should be the contractual obligations of ICANN accredited registrars
> with regard to accredited privacy/proxy service providers? Should registrars
> be permitted to knowingly accept registrations where the registrant is using
> unaccredited service providers that are however bound to the same standards as
> accredited service providers?"
> 
> etc.
>     
> So I am not yet certain this draft is or should be the final word. While the
> remaining changes to this draft may be minor, it maybe worthwhile to go
> through the entire process by creating a drafting team, if just to make sure
> all the "i"s are dotted.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Volker
>> All,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Following up on our discussion regarding the charter for the ³RAA Remaining
>> Issues PDP² on our call on Thursday last week, I hope that we can start a
>> discussion right away regarding possible revisions to the draft charter
>> prepared by staff which I forwarded to you all just prior to our meeting.  I
>> believe our aim should be to form a view as to whether or not the draft
>> charter, as amended according to our anticipated discussions, is a document
>> that can be voted on for adoption at our next Council meeting.
>>  
>> As a reminder, our options are essentially either:
>>  
>> 1.      Discuss and revise this draft charter for formal adoption by the
>> Council, which will then proceed to form a Working Group (WG) to begin work;
>> or 
>> 
>> 2.      Create a Drafting Team (DT) to finalize a charter ­ based either upon
>> this draft or starting from a blank slate ­ to be proposed for adoption at a
>> later Council meeting.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On our Thursday call last week, several Councillors supported option 1 above
>> as a pragmatic way forward i.e. to see if we can find agreement as to the
>> terms of the charter that will govern the WG's work. I am therefore
>> circulating the draft Charter again (re-titled and slightly revised to more
>> accurately reflect the scope of the PDP) for discussion.
>>  
>> My sense is that the scope will be largely governed by the specific issues
>> that are laid out in Section III of the draft Charter.  So, perhaps we can
>> start by discussing possible revisions to these questions, not in terms of
>> substantive discussion over the merits or content of the answers, but in
>> relation to whether they sufficiently describe and frame the scope of work
>> for the WG.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> If we are able to reach agreement within the next week, we can then propose
>> the revised charter for adoption on 21 October i.e. within the document
>> deadline for our upcoming 31 October meeting.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I look forward to an engaging and constructive discussion on the list on this
>> topic.
>>  
>> Thanks,
>>  
>>  
>> Jonathan
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
>  
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
>  
> Volker A. Greimann
> - Rechtsabteilung -
>  
> Key-Systems GmbH
> Im Oberen Werk 1
> 66386 St. Ingbert
> Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
> Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
> Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net
>  
> Web: www.key-systems.net <http://www.key-systems.net>  / www.RRPproxy.net
> <http://www.RRPproxy.net>
> www.domaindiscount24.com <http://www.domaindiscount24.com>  /
> www.BrandShelter.com <http://www.BrandShelter.com>
>  
> Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
> www.facebook.com/KeySystems <http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems>
> www.twitter.com/key_systems <http://www.twitter.com/key_systems>
>  
> Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
> Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
> Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
>  
> Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
> www.keydrive.lu <http://www.keydrive.lu>
>  
> Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen
> Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder
> Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese
> Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per
> E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
>  
> --------------------------------------------
>  
> Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
>  
> Best regards,
>  
> Volker A. Greimann
> - legal department -
>  
> Key-Systems GmbH
> Im Oberen Werk 1
> 66386 St. Ingbert
> Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
> Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
> Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net
>  
> Web: www.key-systems.net <http://www.key-systems.net>  / www.RRPproxy.net
> <http://www.RRPproxy.net>
> www.domaindiscount24.com <http://www.domaindiscount24.com>  /
> www.BrandShelter.com <http://www.BrandShelter.com>
>  
> Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
> www.facebook.com/KeySystems <http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems>
> www.twitter.com/key_systems <http://www.twitter.com/key_systems>
>  
> CEO: Alexander Siffrin
> Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
> V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
>  
> Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
> www.keydrive.lu <http://www.keydrive.lu>
>  
> This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this
> email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an
> addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify
> the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
>  
>  
>  


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20131017/0239517d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 17 Oct Revised Draft RAA Charter.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 110592 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20131017/0239517d/17OctRevisedDraftRAACharter.doc>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5033 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20131017/0239517d/smime.p7s>

More information about the council mailing list