AW: [council] Review Project List
Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de
Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de
Thu Dec 1 20:15:39 UTC 2016
Thanks Berry,
indeed, I was looking the redline version not understanding that the"2nd"
graph is also put in red lines.
Sorry for the confusion.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
-----Original-Nachricht-----
Betreff: RE: [council] Review Project List
Datum: 2016-12-01T17:32:27+0100
Von: "Berry Cobb" <mail at berrycobb.com>
An: "'WUKnoben'" <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>, "'Glen de Saint Géry'"
<Glen at icann.org>, "council at gnso.icann.org" <council at gnso.icann.org>
Hi Wolf-Ulrich,
If I understand correctly, you are referencing the red-line version of the
project list.
The difference, as you note, is based on time. Specifically, what projects
have changed from the prior version to this current version. The projects
are tabulated based on where they reside on the various phases of the
policy development process.
Here are a few explanations for the changes:
1. Issue Identification – this is primarily the GNSO Council Actions
list. Prior version showed 9 open items, while the current one shows 7.
2. A project (Auctions Proceeds) moved to the Working Group phase, as
the Council (and other SO/ACs) approved its Charter in Hyderabad. As you
know Members are being decided now, as well as a call for Participants is
underway.
3. The GNSO Review WG motion will be considered at today’s meeting,
and as such, migrated from Working Group to Council Deliberations. Once
adopted and later approved by the Board, it will migrate to Implementation.
4. GAC-GNSO Consultation Group motion was adopted in Hyderabad, and
thus migrated to Implementation for staff action.
The red-line changes in the table below the graphs provide the primary key
to the changes.
I hope this is helpful.
B
Berry A. Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers
720.839.5735
mail at berrycobb.com <mailto:mail at berrycobb.com>
@berrycobb
From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org]
On Behalf Of WUKnoben
Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 09:14
To: Glen de Saint Géry; council at gnso.icann.org
Subject: Re: [council] Review Project List
Thanks Glen,
I have one question for the call later today: the 1st two bar graphs seem
to show the projects’ status. What is the difference (time?)?
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
From: Glen de Saint Géry
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 3:37 PM
To: council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: [council] Review Project List
Dear Councillors,
Attached please find the updated Project List in both red-line and clean
version for your review before the Council meetings. If there are no
comments, the list will be posted on the website on page.
http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/project
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/project>
and be directly viewed at:
http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/projects-list.pdf
<http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/projects-list.pdf>
Thanks so much.
Kind regards,
Glen
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>
http://gnso.icann.org <http://gnso.icann.org/>
Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses
<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages
<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>
.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20161201/7b45028f/attachment.html>
More information about the council
mailing list