[council] Amended Motion: GNSO CSC Liaison Candidates
WUKnoben
wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de
Thu Jul 21 09:20:11 UTC 2016
You’re definitely right David. Either the scale should be 1 to 5 or the bars’ length doubled.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
From: David Cake
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 9:59 AM
To: Glen de Saint Géry
Cc: mailto:council at gnso.icann.org
Subject: Re: [council] Amended Motion: GNSO CSC Liaison Candidates
On 20 Jul 2016, at 6:29 PM, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen at icann.org> wrote:
and the GNSO CSC Liaison Evaluation has been published at:
http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-csc-liaison-evaluation-16jul16-en.pdf
on page:
http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/drafts
There is an issue with the graphics on that page. If the scores out of 10 that the selection committee gave to James on the criteria for the position seem low, that is because they were actually scores out of 5.
David
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20160721/4ddd15de/attachment.html>
More information about the council
mailing list