[council] Revised Motion on Drafting Team/Empowerment

[James M. Bladel]

+1.  I never took the language to exclude NCAs, so if we feel the need to say this explicitly, then we should.

Thanks-

J.


From: <owner-council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>>
Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>>
Date: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 at 12:07
To: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>, Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com<mailto:julf at julf.com>>
Subject: Re: [council] Revised Motion on Drafting Team/Empowerment

I'm not sure why there is uncertainty.

This motion is related to the GNSO future. NCAs - as members of the council - are part of the GNSO. They should undoubtedly given the opportunity to take part in this effort - either being appointed themselves or appoint others.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich


From: Johan Helsingius<mailto:julf at julf.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 11:12 AM
To: council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] Revised Motion on Drafting Team/Empowerment

Heather,

> As I see it, only the houseless NCA falls into this category

Not sure - a house is, as I see it, neither a constituency or a stakeholder group,
as the whole concept of "houses" is, at least the way I see it, basically just a
voting construct. But, again, I could be very wrong. And anyway, my spell
checker keeps insisting "houseless" should be spelled "horseless".

> but I assume any SG or C could nominate someone of their choosing
> (not necessarily someone from within the SG/C).

I guess so, yes - but (and now we are really getting into minor details, but...)
can a NCA nominate anyone?

    Julf

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20160629/2ac5f36d/attachment.html>