[council] MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC (EMAIL) VOTE - Initiate Amendment Process on Specific Red Cross Names

Wed Apr 26 00:51:02 UTC 2017

Hi James,

quick question with regard to Resolved.1.b which mentions "a defined
limited set of variations of these names"
how and who will decide for those variations?

btw I just noticed that in the whereas we have "189 National Red Cross and
Red Crescent Societies," and in resolved "190 Red Cross National
Societies", shouldn't be the same number (the latter is missing "Red
Crescent" mention, a matter of consistency within the motion)?

Best,

Rafik

2017-04-26 7:04 GMT+09:00 James M. Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com>:

> Councilors –
>
>
> Attached and copied below, please find an amended version of the Motion to
> Initiate Policy Amendment Process on Specific Red Cross Names that was
> discussed during our last meeting.
>
>
>
> Recall that, during our last GNSO Council call on 20 April, the Council
> agreed to defer this Motion to an electronic vote, in order to allow for
> certain updates to be made to the text of the motion. Also note that the
> Council agreed to proceed with an electronic vote outside a regularly
> scheduled Council meeting.
>
>
>
> The updated language of the motion has been reviewed and approved by me as
> its proposer, and Michele and Rubens as its seconders.  It includes some
> minor clarifications received as feedback from the ICRC representatives,
> but does not include any items that materially changed the scope of the
> affected strings, or any other items that were not discussed previously in
> Copenhagen.
>
>
>
> This email will also serve as notice that, as Council Chair, I am hereby *formally
> providing all Councilors with the requisite minimum 7 days’ advance notice
> of the electronic vote, in accordance with Section 4.10.2.d. of the GNSO
> Operating Procedures *(https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-
> procedures-01sep16-en.pdf). The 4-day voting period will begin at *23:59
> UTC on Tuesday 2 May 2017 and close at 23:59 UTC on Saturday 6 May 2017*.
>
>
>
> (Please be reminded that the GNSO Operating Procedures require that
> electronic voting be an open vote, and its outcome be published and
> recorded, with accompanying voter statements, if any, as minutes for
> purposes of formal record keeping.)
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> J.
>
> ------------------
>
> James Bladel
>
> GNSO Chair
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________
>
>
>
> *Initiation of Policy Amendment Process on Specific Red Cross and Red
> Crescent Names - Deferred to electronic vote*
>
> *Submitted by: James Bladel*
>
> *Seconded: Rubens Kuhl, Michele Neylon*
>
>
>
> WHEREAS, in November 2013, the GNSO completed a Policy Development Process
> (PDP) which resulted in a number of consensus recommendations for
> protecting the identifiers of International Governmental Organizations and
> International Non-Governmental Organizations, including the International
> Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement (Movement), at the top and second level
> in all generic top-level domains (gTLDs) (PDP Working Group Final Report:
> https://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/igo-ingo-final-10nov13-en.pdf, with
> Minority Statements: https://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/igo-ingo-
> final-minority-positions-10nov13-en.pdf
> <https://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/igo-ingo-final-minority-positions-10nov13-en.pdf)>
> );
>
> WHEREAS, the GNSO Council approved all the PDP consensus recommendations
> on 20 November 2013 (http://gnso.icann.org/en/
> council/resolutions#20131120-2
> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20131120-2)>) and,
> following a mandatory public comment period on the final PDP
> recommendations, sent its Recommendations Report to the ICANN Board on 23
> January 2014 (https://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/council-board-igo-ingo-
> 23jan14-en.pdf
> <https://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/council-board-igo-ingo-23jan14-en.pdf)>
> );
>
> WHEREAS, on 30 April 2014 the Board adopted those of the GNSO’s PDP
> recommendations that were consistent with GAC advice on the topic, which in
> relation to the Movement were for the terms “Red Cross”, “Red Crescent”,
> “Red Crystal”, and “Red Lion & Sun” (referred to as “Scope 1 Identifiers”
> by the PDP Working Group) to be reserved at the top and second levels, with
> an Exception Procedure to be designed for the affected organization (
> http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/
> resolutions-30apr14-en.htm#2.a
> <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-30apr14-en.htm#2.a)>
> );
>
> WHEREAS, between June 2014 and January 2015 the Board and the GNSO Council
> engaged in discussions of the remaining inconsistencies between GAC advice
> and GNSO policy, which in relation to the Movement concerned the names of
> 189 National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, and the names and
> acronyms of the International Committee of the Red Cross and International
> Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (referred to as
> “Scope 2 Identifiers” by the PDP Working Group);
>
> WHEREAS, at ICANN57 in November 2016 the Board proposed that the GAC and
> the GNSO engage in a facilitated, good faith discussion to attempt to
> resolve the remaining inconsistencies between GAC public policy advice and
> GNSO consensus policy recommendations regarding the “Scope 2 Identifiers”
> of the Movement;
>
> WHEREAS, representatives from the GAC and the GNSO engaged in such a
> facilitated, good faith discussion at ICANN58 in March 2017 during which
> the following matters were noted:
>
> (1)    The public policy considerations associated with protecting the
> Movement’s identifiers in the domain name system (DNS);
>
> (2)    The GAC’s rationale for seeking permanent protection for the terms
> most closely associated with the Movement and its respective components is
> grounded in the protections of the designations “Red Cross”, “Red
> Crescent”, “Red Lion and Sun”, and “Red Crystal” under international treaty
> law and under multiple national laws;
>
> (3)    The list of names of the Red Cross and Red Crescent National
> Societies is a finite, limited list of specific names of the National
> Societies recognized within the Movement (http://www.ifrc.org/Docs/
> ExcelExport/NS_Directory.pdf );
>
> (4)    There are no other legitimate uses for these terms; and
>
> (5)    The GAC had provided clarification following the completion of the
> GNSO PDP, via its March 2014 Singapore Communique, on the finite scope of
> the specific list of Movement names for which permanent protections were
> being requested (https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/28278854/
> Final%20Communique%20-%20Singapore%202014.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=
> 1397225538000&api=v2
> <https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/28278854/Final%20Communique%20-%20Singapore%202014.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1397225538000&api=v2)>
> );
>
> WHEREAS, following the GAC-GNSO discussion, the Board passed a resolution
> on 16 March 2017 requesting that the GNSO initiate its process for
> Amendments or Modifications of Approved Policies, as described in Section
> 16 of the GNSO PDP Manual (https://gnso.icann.org/en/
> council/annex-2-pdp-manual-01sep16-en.pdf
> <https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/annex-2-pdp-manual-01sep16-en.pdf)>),
> to consider amending the GNSO’s approved policy concerning the specific
> names of the Red Cross and Red Crescent National Societies and the specific
> names International Committee of the Red Cross and International Federation
> of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (collectively, Recommendation 5 in
> Section 3.1 of the PDP Working Group Final Report): and
>
> WHEREAS, the GNSO Council agrees that the aforementioned set of
> exceptional circumstances provides a justifiable basis for the Council to
> take this extraordinary step to reconsider the policy recommendation and
> that this is not to be viewed as the Council’s consent to reopen PDP
> recommendations in all cases where GNSO-developed policy is in discord with
> GAC advice:
>
>
>
>
>
> RESOLVED,
>
> 1.The GNSO Council hereby initiates the process described in Section 16 of
> the GNSO PDP Manual; accordingly, the GNSO Council requests that the PDP
> Working Group be reconvened for the purpose of consultation by the GNSO
> Council on the following proposed amendment to Recommendation 5 in Section
> 3.1 of the PDP Working Group Final Report:
>
> (a) The full names of the 190 Red Cross National Societies and the full
> names of the International Committee of the Red Cross and International
> Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies are to be placed into
> Specification 5 of the Base gTLD Registry Agreement, with an exception
> procedure to be created for cases where the relevant Red Cross Red Crescent
> Movement organization wishes to apply for their protected string at the
> second level;
>
> (b) In placing the specified identifiers into Specification 5 of the
> Registry Agreement, this should apply to an exact match of the full name of
> the relevant National Society recognized within the International Red Cross
> and Red Crescent Movement (in English and the official languages of its
> state of origin), the full names of the International Committee of the Red
> Cross and of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent
> Societies (in the six official United Nations languages) and a defined
> limited set of variations of these names; and
>
> (c) In considering the proposed amendment, account is to be duly taken of
> the matters noted during the GAC-GNSO facilitated discussion at ICANN58 as
> well as of the GAC’s public policy advice to reserve the finite list of
> names of the Red Cross and Red Crescent National Societies, as recognized
> within the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, in all gTLDs.
>
> 2. In accordance with Section 16 of the PDP Manual, the GNSO Council
> directs ICANN staff to post the proposed amendment to Recommendation 5 for
> public comment, for a period of 30 days commencing from the date of the
> first meeting of the reconvened PDP Working Group.
>
> 3. In accordance with Section 16 of the PDP Manual, the GNSO Council
> intends to put the proposed amendment to a vote following consultation with
> the PDP Working Group and the conclusion of the requisite public comment
> period. The GNSO Council notes that approval of the proposed amendment
> requires a Supermajority Vote of both Houses in favour of the amendment.
>
> 4. The Council thanks all of those who participated in the talks at
> ICANN58 in Copenhagen, and in particular Bruce Tonkin for moderating the
> discussion.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20170426/13105099/attachment.html>