[council] [CORRESPONDENCE] Cherine Chalaby to Manal Ismail - GNSO PDP on IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights

[Rubens Kuhl]

From the letter:
"
Under the ICANN Bylaws, the Board is obliged to take duly into account any advice timely presented by the Governmental Advisory Committee, prior to taking action."



I thought the bylaws also embedded obligations to timely appreciate GNSO Policy recommendations ? 


Rubens

 


> On 15 Oct 2019, at 10:24, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear Councilors,
>  
> You may be interested to know that the Board responded yesterday to the GAC’s letter of 20 August. The GAC had requested that the Board refrain from acting on Recommendations 1-4 from the IGO-INGO Curative Rights PDP and restated the GAC’s willingness to participate in the GNSO’s new chartering effort with respect to Recommendation 5.
>  
> The GAC’s letter was published and is available for your review here:https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/ismail-to-chalaby-20aug19-en.pdf.
>  
> Cheers
> Mary
>  
>  
> <2019-10-14 Cherine Chalaby to Manal Ismail Board Response to GAC Letter.pdf>_______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
> 
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.