<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><SPAN class=940402015-17122003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>I
suggest that Barbara Roseman, as staff manager to the WHOIS TFs, should present
a paper document for Council, outlining the TFs proposed timelines, so that we
are looking at something written. Oral reports about calendar dates are
hard to follow online....Overall, I support the need to provide extended
time frames, within the steps outlined by the PDP.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=940402015-17122003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=940402015-17122003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>However, for a longer term consideration, it may at some point be
necessary to modify the PDP. I am not suggesting that Council make
that decision at this time, but as those responsible for policy development on
gTLDs, Council may need at some point to consider modifications to the
PDP. I don't mean to open that topic to discussion at this time,
merely to note it to fellow Councilors.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=940402015-17122003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=940402015-17122003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Finally, we need to ensure that the needed and expected staff support
from ICANN is understood by both ICANN and by the TFs. Timely responses and
turnaround on work will be critical, and we do have many, and perhaps
overlapping demands for work. </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=940402015-17122003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><A
href="mailto:mcade@att.com">mcade@att.com</A></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Philip Sheppard
[mailto:philip.sheppard@aim.be]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, December 17, 2003
6:49 AM<BR><B>To:</B> council<BR><B>Subject:</B> [council] WHOIS TF 1:
Question to GNSO Council regarding timelines<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I support the proposal to extend the timeline for the PDP of
WHOIS TF1 but the steps on the described TF1 timetable do not agree with the
PDP. </FONT><FONT size=2>As someone involved in the drafting of the PDP text
our understanding was that its timelines were guidelines that may need to be
adapted by intelligent users. But its steps should be followed.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>It is worth pointing out that the PDP article 7e tells us
that the TF has 50 days (40+5+5) to get a report out for
public comment. There is then 20+10 = 30 days to get a final report to
Council. The total time = 80 days. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>(It would be useful if the GNSO secretariat were to keep a
record of each ACTUAL timeline of all PDPs, so that we can include the
PDP deadlines in the GNSO review later this year. If we then need to
change the deadlines, we can do so).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Philip</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Find the PDP at</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><A
href="http://www.icann.org/general/archive-bylaws/bylaws-26jun03.htm#AnnexA">http://www.icann.org/general/archive-bylaws/bylaws-26jun03.htm#AnnexA</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>